Could you provide a code snippet? Honestly, I'm not sure how to start the code. I think it should be created in the same file as the current filters, but I'm unable to find them...
in the OLD UI I used to create a separate module that stored all the constant values used in the code of the pages, such as a specific AccountTypeId or a SysAdminUnitId. I also used to add this module in the edit pages to access those values.
Now I need to do the same thing in the Freedom UI and I haven't figured out how to do it yet. I tried using the same approach by adding the Module in the SCHEMA DEPS and ARGS of the page definition, but I can't access the properties of the custom module.
I did additional tests and found that referencing the module in the SCHEMA DEPS and ARGS is correct, even though while debugging it's not possible to see the page constants "clearly". However, using "await" allows you to access to those values.
For example, like this:
var customerType = await UsrTestConfigurationEnum.AccountTypes.Customer;
I did additional tests and found that referencing the module in the SCHEMA DEPS and ARGS is correct, even though while debugging it's not possible to see the page constants "clearly". However, using "await" allows you to access to those values.
For example, like this:
var customerType = await UsrTestConfigurationEnum.AccountTypes.Customer;
In the application we are building we have necessity to have Rich Text field that need to be filled with log descriprion (400/500 characters). The content of this field is not all visible in list section. Because of this we are asking the following:
- In a list Section is it possible to increase the height of a row so that all the content of a field clould be visible to the final user (please refer to attached file)?
Right now the only possibility a final user has to see the entire content of the field is with the tooltip.
Unfortunately, this feature is not available in the basic build.
At the moment, this can only be implemented through development methods.
We've registered it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in future application releases. Thank you for helping us to improve our product.
Hi, every time after compiling, I encounter the error below, and despite checking the log files, I cannot find any information to understand what the problem might be. Could you help me?
This error can occur because the Creatio app is missing or conflicts with components that are required. We recommend that you reinstall the .NET SDK according to the article on Creatio Academy and deploy the app again. If you still have problems after doing this, please open a separate request with the Creatio support team.
This error can occur because the Creatio app is missing or conflicts with components that are required. We recommend that you reinstall the .NET SDK according to the article on Creatio Academy and deploy the app again. If you still have problems after doing this, please open a separate request with the Creatio support team.
This behavior is absolutely correct: now all the stages from DCM, which were before the current stage, are presented in the object's stage history. The previous behavior was a bag and was fixed in the current release.
To get back to old logic you may disable the feature 'SynchronizeStagesByDcm'.
There is no such option for now. However, we've registered it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in the future application releases.
Hello Im trying to set the self registration for external users but the license is not distribution automatic can you help me to know how can I configure that?
Unfortunately, we don't have such functionality, but you can use our training, where all videos are recorded along with instructions on how to use the system:
Unfortunately, we don't have such functionality, but you can use our training, where all videos are recorded along with instructions on how to use the system:
Hi, is there a way to set a "Reply To' parameter for an Email?
"Senders Email" is configurable via macros in the Header of the Email template.
Need the same capability for "Reply To", so when the Client responds to the Email, it is directed to the person specified in the Reply To parameter (not to the senders email address).