Making a checkbox required would only mean it can be checked (since there's no difference between unchecked and not filled in). Alternative approach is to use a lookup with Yes/No values (since then there is also a not filled in)

Hello Ryan Farley,

What happens is that I have a set of questions with three answer options each, and for each question, only one option needs to be filled out. I have a business rule that marks the boxes as required, but when one of them is selected, it disables the other two and makes them optional. The problem is that once you select a box and uncheck it, the required  disappears, allowing you to save with the three options blank. That's why I want to make the checkboxes required from the configuration.

And the reason for the checkboxes is that I require the checkmarks to appear in the Word report.

Hello,

Adding images to a printable form is possible using basic methods — the key is to correctly drill down and select the right column.

You need to create a table part in report with the required object. After that, add a column as follows:

I hope this helps. All the best!

Hello,

 Currently, adding custom icons to the system is not supported. However, there are plans to expand the standard icon library and provide the ability to add custom icons. We have attached your request for our R&D team task to increase its priority. 

In case of any further questions – send them in reply to this Email. We would be happy to assist!

Any help would be appreciated. 

Still didn't find a solution.

Hello,

From what you've shared, it looks like the process isn't retrieving the uploaded image as expected. To help pinpoint the issue, here are a few steps to take:
1. Turn on tracing for the business process. This will show whether the record ID and file attachment are actually being passed to the process at runtime.

2. Make sure that the RecordId used in the “Process file” element is the same ID as the one associated with the uploaded attachment. If you're triggering the process manually, double-check that the correct record is selected or passed in.

3. In your “Process file” element, you've selected HomeSection as the object. Confirm that the attachment was uploaded to this exact object. If the file was uploaded to a different object (e.g. another section or lookup), you’ll need to change the source object in the element configuration accordingly.

4. You can directly query the SysFile table (or the relevant attachment table) and check if the uploaded file is tied to the expected record ID and object schema.

Hello,

We checked the functionality and want to inform you that unfortunately there is no possibility to change it yet.

We have registered it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in future application releases. 

Thank you for helping us to improve our product.

If you drag them taller it will give more room for the chart bars/columns and the text will be more readable.

Ryan Farley,

Thank you! This worked. I did not see the little square to drag the chart taller before.

Hello!

Could you please add more details regarding your business aim?

If you mean changing the list page view in the section, in Creatio, list pages typically display data in a tabular format.

The main goal is to implement a schedule for approximately 100 employees.
There was an idea to implement it using a registry element.
However, the usual calendar view does not quite fit (i.e., dates and working hours are represented horizontally, and employees are listed vertically).
Since the number of employees will be relatively static, but weeks/months will continuously be added, the standard registry view is not entirely suitable for implementation.
The need arose to add new records horizontally (with the ability to scroll left/right) — these will be the weeks/months, while employees will remain static vertically.

The idea is to add new records to the registry horizontally, not vertically.
If it's not entirely clear, I can explain in more detail.

Is such implementation possible?
Perhaps you already have a ready solution for the schedule or better alternatives for implementing it?

The list component has a couple of attributes you can use for this. You'll add a handler for the "crt.HandleViewModelAttributeChangeRequest" request and listen for changes to these attributes. There are a few attributes you could use, one that is ListName_NoItems (boolean) (or "DataTable_NoFilteredItems" for when the list is filtered) or ListName_Items (array of items). If your list component is named "DataGrid_ysopiif", your attribute names would be "DataGrid_ysopiif_NoItems", etc.

Add something like the following to the handlers of the page with the list:

{
    request: "crt.HandleViewModelAttributeChangeRequest",
    handler: async (request, next) => {
        if (request.attributeName === "DataTable_NoItems" || request.attributeName === "DataTable_NoFilteredItems") {
            if (request.value) {
                // no records returned for list
            	Terrasoft.showInformation("No results returned!");
            }
        }
    	return next?.handle(request);
    }
}

Ryan

Ryan thanks -- moved to Data_grid and used the following code and it works. 

Now to see how to fix a filter which can show only records which are modified in last 5 mins (out of box gives in hours only)


        handlers: /**SCHEMA_HANDLERS*/[
            {
                request: "crt.RefreshedDataGrid",
                handler: async (request, next) => {
                      const context = await request.$context;
                      const list = await context.DataGrid_cdjhzhp;
                      const listCount = list?.length ?? 0;
                      if ( listCount == 0 &&  await request.$context.SearchFilter_fvbn39g_SearchValue.__zone_symbol__value
!= null ){
                              const uxClaimID= await request.$context.SearchFilter_fvbn39g_SearchValue.__zone_symbol__value
;
                              console.log("Claim Id = " + uxClaimID);
                               const result = await request.$context.executeRequest({
                                          type: "crt.RunBusinessProcessRequest",
                                          processName: "HC_ClaimACID",
                                          processParameters: { ClaimID: uxClaimID },
                                          //resultParameterNames: ["HC_ClaimGUID"],
                                          $context: request.$context
                               });
                               //if (await result.success) { 
                                // }
                       }
                      return next?.handle(request);  
             } 
         }        

Hello! Recursive sub-processes-where a process calls itself directly as a sub-process-are not supported natively in the Business Process Designer, and for good reasons:

Why it's not allowed by default:
Recursion can easily result in infinite process executions if not managed carefully (e.g., no base case or exit condition).

Recursive calls could overload the scheduler queue and background processes.

The BP Designer intentionally filters out the current process from the list of available subprocesses to avoid this scenario.

Alternative Solutions:
1. Create a secondary wrapper process (e.g., MyProcessWrapper) that calls the main process (MyRecursiveProcess).

Inside MyRecursiveProcess, under certain conditions, call the wrapper again.

This technically breaks the direct recursion and gives more control.

2. Instead of recursion, Creatio recommends modeling loops with Gateways (Exclusive or Inclusive) and Intermediate Timer or Signal Events to create a controlled looping behavior.

3. If your recursion is simple (e.g., batch iteration or hierarchical processing), consider using Script Tasks with logic in C# to handle recursion internally. This avoids BPM overhead.

Nick Ovchynnik,

Thank you Nick for the detailed response.