It would look like this - I typically also add Type=4 for users (although that’s a little redundant) and also add Connection Type=0 to get employee users (not external/portal users). 

Basically, from your screenshot, click "Quantity". Then set count > 0 (or click count to change to exists), then add the sub-conditions under that.

Ryan

Ryan Farley,

Thank you Ryan for your time and help! This solution worked for me. 

Hello,

In order to create the mask for the text field you can add a handler that will apply formatting to the text field value when user are typing.

You can use the following code snippet as an example:

{
	request: "crt.HandleViewModelAttributeChangeRequest",
	handler: async (request, next) => {
		if(request.attributeName == "PDS_SCCPF_luo5kno"){
			let value = await request.$context.PDS_SCCPF_luo5kno; 
			value = value.replace(/\D/g, ""); // Remove non-digit characters
			if (value.length > 11){
				value = value.slice(0, 11); // Limit to 11 digits
			}
			let formatted = "";
			if (value.length > 0) {
				formatted += value.slice(0, 3);
			}
			if (value.length >= 4) {
				formatted += "." + value.slice(3, 6);
			}
			if (value.length >= 7) {
				formatted += "." + value.slice(6, 9);
			}
			if (value.length >= 10) {
				formatted += "-" + value.slice(9, 11);
			}
			request.$context.PDS_SCCPF_luo5kno = formatted;
 			request.preventAttributeChangeRequest = true;
		}
		return next?.handle(request);
	}
}

Thanks so much.
It worked wonderfully.

Dear Nicolas,

You can implement this logic in Freedom UI pages using "Apply filter by page data". 

Below, you can see an example of this binding using "Case Lifecycle" list as an example:



Here is a link on how to set this up: https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8.x/no-code-customization/customization-tools/ui-and-business-logic-customization/element-setup-examples/components/set-up-list-components#title-2761-2 

I hope this helps. Have a great day!

Creatio does have this, or at least it can work like this. If you're using organizational roles, each organizational role can have a management role. The management role inherits the permissions of the users in the organizational role. Meaning, if you create an org role called "sales" and then add an management role for the sales org role, the people in the management role inherit the permissions of the users in the org role. See https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8.x/setup-and-administration/administration/user-and-access-management/user-management/organizational-roles#title-2266-2

Note, this often means you also need to setup object/record permissions for things based on these roles as well, instead of by users (so the permissions can be inherited by the managers of the role). For example, you could add record access permissions that if anyone in "sales" creates a record, that edit permissions is given to anyone in the "sales managers role".

Ryan

Ok, Thanks -- that's kind of what I thought, with my rudimentary experience with roles (and Creatio in general).

So, applying this to our large sales organization ...
Instead of implementing a single "sales" role, we would need to implement a "superuser" role, but for each sales division -- perhaps?

For example, we have 8 sales regions, like "Asia" and "Europe" and "South America".  There are 30-50 sales reps in each region.
We don't want all their "issues" trickling up to one admin, so as I mentioned we want a "SuperUser" in each region:  "SuperUser-Asia", SuperUser-India" and so on.  I guess these would be "management" roles in Creatio.

So, we would have to divide up the Sales Reps (users) into separate orgs (one for each region) so that their data would be visible to their SuperUser? 
Can I create separate orgs in Creatio, all living underneath the main Company org?

Thanks -- any suggestions you have are appreciated!

Rob

Yes, the roles are hierarchical. Each sub role inheriting the permissions of the roles before. You can have a role for sales, then sub roles for each division. Each division can have a managers role which could give them inherited permissions for the division they manage.  

I will have to review this with our integrator.   They are telling us that in the forthcoming release of Creatio, there are some enhancements to roles and permissions -- Are there any hints or documentation as to what this might be?   We need to allow certain roles to be able to edit specific data but not all.

(For example, a salesman creates a customer account DuPont Paints and can assign it to a "master" account DuPont International. This is really something that his local manager admin should also able to do, but can't)

Hello,

Please reattach your screenshot since its corrupted and cannot be reviewed. In general please make sure your package where the element is developed is not the assembly package and that the product that you are working in is of marketing build (like sales-enterprise-marketing-service-enterprise).

Hi Enjio! How are you? As a quick workaround, you could use "Add Data," element add a record, for example, in a "LogSMS" custom entity, and create a BP that has a trigger on that table and the logic for sending the SMS.

Hi,

Yes, starting from version 8.x, Creatio uses dependency injection (DI) more actively, including for services like IFileRepository, which is now resolved via ClassFactory.Get<IFileRepository>().

To override the default implementation, you can register your custom class as the default for the interface in the dependency container.
 

Solution: Register your class for the interface

You have to create your own AppEventListener and bind your class to the appropriate interface there.

public class UsrAppEventListener : AppEventListenerBase
{
	public override void OnAppStart(AppEventContext context) 	{
		base.OnAppStart(context);
		ClassFactory.Bind<IFileRepository, CustomFileRepository>(reuseType: ReuseType.Singleton);
    }
}

Where:

• CustomFileRepository is your custom class that implements IFileRepository
• ReuseType.Singleton (or None) depends on your usage

⚠️ Important: Ensure your class fully implements the IFileRepository interface.

This way, when FileService calls ClassFactory.Get<IFileRepository>(), it will receive your custom implementation.

TU Irina

Tomasz Branicki,

Hi Irina.
I finally manage to upgrate creatio properly so i can try your sollution.
write now i gut such error

Terrasoft.Core.InstanceActivationException
 HResult=0x80131600
 Message=Error creating an instance of the "Terrasoft.Configuration.IFileRepository" class
 Source=<Cannot evaluate the exception source>
 StackTrace:
<Cannot evaluate the exception stack trace>

 This exception was originally thrown at this call stack:
   [External Code]

Inner Exception 1:
ActivationException: Error activating IFileRepository
More than one matching bindings are available.
Matching bindings:
 1) binding from IFileRepository to FileRepository
 2) binding from IFileRepository to UsrFileRepository
Activation path:
 1) Request for IFileRepository

Suggestions:
 1) Ensure that you have defined a binding for IFileRepository only once.

My class is describe like that

    [Terrasoft.Core.Factories.Override]
   public class UsrFileRepository : FileRepository.

can you give me a hand :)

regards
Tomek

Iryna Oriyenko,

Hi Irina.
I finally manage to upgrate creatio properly so i can try your sollution.
write now i gut such error

Terrasoft.Core.InstanceActivationException
 HResult=0x80131600
 Message=Error creating an instance of the "Terrasoft.Configuration.IFileRepository" class
 Source=<Cannot evaluate the exception source>
 StackTrace:
<Cannot evaluate the exception stack trace>

 This exception was originally thrown at this call stack:
   [External Code]

Inner Exception 1:
ActivationException: Error activating IFileRepository
More than one matching bindings are available.
Matching bindings:
 1) binding from IFileRepository to FileRepository
 2) binding from IFileRepository to UsrFileRepository
Activation path:
 1) Request for IFileRepository

Suggestions:
 1) Ensure that you have defined a binding for IFileRepository only once.

My class is describe like that

    [Terrasoft.Core.Factories.Override]
   public class UsrFileRepository : FileRepository.

can you give me a hand :)

regards
Tomek

Iryna Oriyenko,

Hi Iryna;
I find solution
I used rebind except bind.
thank you for help

regards Tomek

The new behavior is Creatio tries to make it's best judgement of where to save things, it does NOT use the Current Package setting. It's not often correct in where it decides to save things IMO and a bit frustrating, so there's really no where to see it because the system will decide differently based on what item you're trying to save. This article shows how to force save a page into a certain application's pacakge or to turn off the new way and revert back to using the Current Package system setting instead: https://customerfx.com/article/reverting-the-behavior-for-saving-pages-in-the-creatio-freedom-ui-designer-to-use-current-package-setting/

Ryan

Thanks Ryan,

we are trying to have App/package structure where one App has all of the objects and then all of the different apps are dependent on the Data from the DB package.

Intention is to deliver independently from data model different apps for different projects ongoing in the customer

This would work fine with classic but now we are running into some question because of this "smart" behavior.

Last example was Creatio added a field in the activity object to link to custom object when we added a list to the page of the custom object

Do you think this approach would fix these issues?

Thanks again

Check out this article:

Store app data | Creatio Academy

Greeting,

Currently, there is no option to modify the "Primary culture" system setting, which is responsible for the default culture in the system. 

By default, English is set as the base culture for all system builds to ensure the proper functioning of our product, including multilingual templates and localized user experiences.

If you need to change the language, this can be done in the system user profile for each individual user. 

Modifying the "Primary culture" system setting could result in incorrect functionality, so it is essential to adjust the language preference at the user level.

We understand that this limitation may cause challenges, and we have already submitted a request to our R&D department to explore implementing this functionality in future system releases.

Please let us know if you have other questions.

Thank you for reaching out!

Hello!
 

You can bulk change the value of the SysCultureId column for users in the SysAdminUnit table. The corresponding values can be found in the SysCulture table.
After that, the user will need to re-login in the system to apply the localization changes, or you can flush Redis so that all users are forced to re-authorize.
 

Please be careful when applying this approach and check it in detail on a test environment before implementing on prod.

Hello,

Please note that OOTB business process element "Process file" can only generate Word reports, you can find more details about its functionality in this article:

https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8.x/no-code-customization/bpm-tools/process-elements-reference/system-actions/process-file-element

Instead, you can use the "Generate Excel report" element that is a part of the "Excel reports builder for Creatio" app. 

Please note, that only the reports with "Custom report" type and a checked "Available in process" boolean can be used in the process.

Mira Dmitruk,

Hi, Mira, 

    Thank you for your help, however, I can't find "Available in process" setting in the Excel report setting, that may be the reason that I can't find it inside Excel in BP. What's the reason? I'm using 8.2.1.5446 Creatio cloud version, install the excel builder app few days ago. 
 


Jeffrey.

 

Jeffrey,

That option is only available for Custom Report types, not Section Reports as shown in your screenshot. If you create a new Excel report with type=Custom Report, it will show for that one.

Ryan