We are having an issue with the BPMonline WordPress plugin not pulling information from our forms - instead sending them to an error page. We have isolated that the plugin is the issue as the forms work okay when the plugin is removed.
Have upgrades been made to the plugin's compatibility with the Php 8.0 and/or WordPress Platform 5.9?
We started having this issue on 3/9. We updated the platforms on 3/23. We have just gone in and tested - by turning the BPMonline plugin back on and we are still receiving a Wordpress "critical error" notice.
Then it is because of how newer php versions treats constant string values. If you feel adventurous enough to edit the plugin (and if that is the error you're getting), you can fix it by doing the following (there are 3 lines to change, basically just enclosing some values in quotes). NOTE: only do this if you're comfortable editing the PHP code, doing something wrong can break your whole website. So proceed at your own risk. If this isn't something you're comfortable with, contact a PHP developer for help.
In Wordpress to go Plugins -> Plugin Editor.
Select "Forms-3rd-Party-Integration-Bpmonline-1.0.6" and make sure you have the "forms-3rdparty-integration.php" file selected.
Go to line 611 and change this:
if(isset($_COOKIE[bpmRef])) {
to this (notice quotes around bpmRef):
if(isset($_COOKIE["bpmRef"])) {
Go to line 617 and change this:
if(isset($_COOKIE[bpmHref])) {
To this (notice quotes around bpmHref):
if(isset($_COOKIE["bpmHref"])) {
Go to line 623 and change this:
if(isset($_COOKIE[bpmTrackingId])) {
To this (notice quotes around bpmTrackingId):
if(isset($_COOKIE["bpmTrackingId"])) {
Save the file by clicking "Update file"
I don't know if you'll encounter other errors with the plugin code, but that will fix the error I mentioned above.
2) There are _getTabsVisibility, getExtraActionDashboadTabVisible and getEsnChannelVisible methods in the base SectionActionsDashboard module and they all contain the following check:
There is the initTabs method in the BaseActionsDashboard that removes this tab from the portal in this part of code:
if(!this.get("UseDashboard")){
var dashboardTabName =this.get("DashboardTabName");this.removeTab(dashboardTabName);}
Even if adding this tab in the diff it won't be displayed in the page because of this method. This method logic should be overridden and also you should check if the localizable string for the caption is added to the PortalCaseSectionActionsDashboard.
Thank you Oscar, dashboard tab is now showing in Portal Case.
Do you have idea why default subject is not setting on Portal Case. I tried to debug the source code and breakpoint is not going to "setListenerEmailData" method in "EmailMessagePublisherPage.js". Any idea please?
I am trying to understand the logic of why we can not add an organization (Account) to an organizational structure of the system. I have seen some of the documentation and tables that link to VwSysAdminUnit and VwSspAdminUnit but I can not find out why they are not displayed in the user interface the same as in the portal organizational structure.
Such logic was implemented only for portal users since the Self-service Portal was designed only for them and they could be from different companies (accounts).
First of all please keep in mind that access rights might be inherited and since your custom section is based on Contact lookup - permissions are checked for Contacts as well as for your Custom section.
We also recommend looking at the SysSSPEntitySchemaAccessList table. There should be a record of the schema with which you have a problem. For portal users, by default, all schemas are considered to be administered and inaccessible. In order that portal users can use them, this schema must be in the lookup (the list of objects available to portal users). In other words - it must be in the SysSSPEntitySchemaAccessList table. After adding this schema to this table, the problem should be solved.
Should the above trouble-shooting not resolve your issue - please send us an email with detailed explanations of your problem to support@creatio.com so we may inspect and analyze your specific case (as it is too few details available by now and further evaluation will be required for precise solution)
Thank you for your question. Could you please elaborate more on your business task? Would you like to receive a notification each time a record is modified? Kindly provide us with more details.
I am trying to create a lookup filter in client side based on the values of a detail. The case is as follows: I want to display within the application only the contacts which are in the detail UsrApplicationAssignedTo where the application id must be equal to the id of the current application.
After adding the following code to my page I get 0 records.
attributes:{"UsrAssignedTo":{// Attribute data type."dataValueType": Terrasoft.DataValueType.LOOKUP,
// The configuration object of the LOOKUP type."lookupListConfig":{// Array of filters used for the query that forms the lookup field data."filters":[
function(){
var filterGroup = Ext.create("Terrasoft.FilterGroup");
filterGroup.add("Contact",
Terrasoft.createColumnIsNotNullFilter("[UsrApplicationAssignedTo:UsrContact].UsrContact.Id"));
debugger;
filterGroup.add("AppFilters",
Terrasoft.createColumnFilterWithParameter(
Terrasoft.ComparisonType.EQUAL,
"[UsrApplicationAssignedTo:UsrApplication].Id",
this.get("Id")));return filterGroup;}]}}}
Similar filter example was already provided here with the only difference in the section name (there it was the Projects section, here it's Applications section).
Similar filter example was already provided here with the only difference in the section name (there it was the Projects section, here it's Applications section).
I have a requirement that in details once you created a record with a record number(for Ex:-800009), you can't create another record with same record number. I have to restrict the duplicate creation of record number.
Unfortunately, at the moment, deduplication functionality can only be used for the main columns of the object, i.e. You cannot set up rules for searching for duplicates for details.
Details pull information from another section. It is necessary to search and merge duplicates in the section itself.
We have already registered the idea for our R&D team to implement this functionality in further releases. I will assign your case to this project in order to increase its priority.
that seems to be regular JS code which works properly independently from the environment. Could you please specify what is exactly not working? It does not generate a number at all? Or it does generate a wrong one? How exactly are you using later this date?
There is one section section1 with a lookup Lookup1 and another section section2 that has the same lookup Lookup1. I want to fetch the value of two columns of section1 with the same lookup value that is selected in section2.
1) Empty ParentId for the module that the parent should have (you should deploy the OOB DB check with a query)
SELECT * FROM SysSchema
WHERE ManagerName = 'EntitySchemaManager'
AND ParentId IS NULL
set of return values on the box and on the site with the problem. If it is different, then delete such objects from the system (DELETE FROM SysSchema)
2) empty metadata for some object/scheme in the system.
SELECT Id, CAST (MetaData AS varchar (MAX)) FROM SysSchema
WHERE CAST (MetaData AS varchar (MAX)) = ''
You can also look in the application logs in the Common and Error log files for whether additional information on the generation of statics has been recorded (usually the error should be signed there with details). And you can also directly filter all schemes by the "Has error" filter in the configuration:
and see if any objects in the list are returned. If yes, then "Last error message" will be filled on the object in "Properties":
