Hi Team,

 

I have created two custom attachment Detail [ Attach claims & Attach Documents], and linked them with the section but getting error when opening the record page please see the below screenshot

 

Also if you see layout of "Drag file here" in case of custom attachment detail is not looking good. Is there a way to remove that ?

 

Please help !

Thanks for your time!

Like 0

Like

1 comments

Hello 



Unfortunately, the system does not provide the ability to display two details on the same page.

We have conveyed your wishes to the product analysts, they will consider the possibility of implementing functionality for you in the next releases of the product.

 

Best regards,

Bogdan

Show all comments

Hi Team,



Is there a way to use two different servers for IMAP and SMTP for on-premises deployment as below?



a)Consume the IMAP server available in the on-premise network.

b)Consume SMTP via AWS.



If there is a way to achieve this, kindly share the guidelines.







Best Regards,

Bhoobalan P.

Like 0

Like

2 comments

Hello Bhoobalan,



Thank you for your question!

Unfortunately, Creatio does not support using different mail servers for one mailbox.

 

As a workaround, you can set up multiple mailboxes that will use different mailing servers.

 

Best regards,

Artem.

Artem,

Thanks for the response!

 

Show all comments

Hi Community,

 

To test the HAProxy, I've installed two Creatio Applications on my virtual machine, using Docker. Each instance can be access through a specific container address.

 

I've successfully configured HAProxy by following this guide (https://academy.creatio.com/docs/user/on_site_deployment/deployment_additional_setup/application_server_web_farm_shortcut/application_server_web_farm). If I stop one of the containers, the HAProxy sends the requests to the other container, as expected. However, when both containers are up and running, I cannot pass through the login page.

 

I need help to understand:

What is the cause of such behaviour?

What are the possible solutions to solve this problem?

Will this problem occur if each instance is in a separated machine?

 

Note: I’ve notice on other tests that when I have two Creatio instances on the same machine I can only be logged one at the time. Maybe this is related to the problem.

 

Best Regards,

Pedro Pinheiro

Like 1

Like

3 comments

I think I’ve managed to solve this problem. In some applications we need to ensure that the user must be connected to the same server during the whole session. So, to allow this I changed the Load Balance Algorithm to source.

frontend front
     maxconn 10000
     #Using these ports for binding
     bind *:80
     bind *:443
     #Convert cookies to be secure
     rspirep ^(set-cookie:.*)  \1;\ Secure
     default_backend creatio
 
backend creatio
     #set balance type
     balance source       
     server node_1 nodeserver1:80 check weight 2
     server node_2 nodeserver2:80 check weight 1

The problem was solved, but I don't know if this is the correct way to solve it. I would like to hear some feedback. Thank you.

 

Best Regards,

Pedro Pinheiro

Hi Pedro, 



We generally recommend using round-robin, as it's optimal in most cases, but the "source" algorithm is working as well. 

As for why the log-in issue happened: it's hard to say definitely, but on of the options is if the machinekey is different on different nodes - it won't let you log in. 

 

Best regards,

Yurii.

Hi Yurii Sokil,

 

I moved this infrastructure to a Linux server. In this server I have the same two instances but with different ports instead of docker containers. How can I generate this "machinekey”?

 

The documentation only explains how to generate them on windows servers, through  PowerShell.

 

Best Regards,

Pedro Pinheiro

Show all comments

Hello everybody

I'm working in file-system mode in a 7.18.5 development environment.

I need to override the OnSaving method of the Account entity then I created a custom EntityEventListener (following Creatio documentation).

I followed all the instructions of Creatio documentation  to setup my Visual Studio 2019 Enterprise and my local Creatio web application (see https://academy.creatio.com/docs/sites/en/files/pdf/guide/191/Debugging_7.18.pdf).

I worked both on "Compile into a separate assembly" package (in this case opening the package project file) and "traditional" package (in this case using the autogenerated Terrasoft.Configuration.sln solution).

When I attach to w3svc process my VS2019 (run as administrator) the breakpoints are not recognized because the symbols are not loaded. Then I force to load symbols so the breakpoints are recognized (see image below):

 

If I add a new break point during debug there's an error:

 

Anyway.. the debugging doesn't work: if I press F10 or F5 the breakpoints after the first are not manged and the execution ends.

 

So we have two main problems:

1) The symbols are not automatically loaded (but I can do it manually..)

2) The debugging tools dont work

 

I'm I doing something wrong?

I can I really debug server-side code?

Thanks

 

Like 0

Like

4 comments

Hello Massimiliano,

 

As for the automated symbols download - yes, please download them manually in case automated download didn't download all the symbols.

 

As for the breakpoint set - unfortunately there is no standard solution for this, only those described in forums here or here.

 

Best regards,

Oscar

Oscar Dylan,

Hello Oscar,

It seems related to the "Optimize code" option but it seems to me that Creatio compiles the packages in Release mode and not in Debug mode. Does the issue comes from that? Is there any solutions?

Thakns

Best regards

Massimiliano

Massimiliano,

 

<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.7">

        <assemblies>

          <add assembly="System.Runtime, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />

        </assemblies>

      </compilation>

 

and all other settings performed in terms of the article you sent should compile packages in debug mode.

 

Best regards,

Oscar

Dear Oscar

I tried to change that setting in both web.config files (the "root one" and the "Terrasoft.WebApp one") but it didn't work. I saw that the dll's are compiled into the "Release" folder and not into "Debug" folder.

Am I doing something wrong?

If we set "debug=true" in the web.config files, are the packages created correctly to be deployed to production environments or do we need to reset the "debud=false" and recompile before exporting the packages?

Best regards

Massimiliano

Show all comments

Hi Team,

 

How to remove this highlighted communication option under the progress bar (setup using section cases designer). Please see the below screenshot

Here we need only progress bar.

 

Please help!

 

Thank you for your time!

Like 0

Like

5 comments

Hi Akshit,

 

The code below should be added to the diff array of the ActionsDashboard module of your section:

{
				"operation": "remove",
				"name": "Tabs"
			}

Once done and the page is refreshed you will see that the tabs were removed:

Best regards,

Oscar

Oscar Dylan,



How to identify the ActionDashbaord module of any section (OOTB / Custom section)?

Could you please share the steps to identify the corresponding action dashboard module of a section?

 

Best Regards,

Bhoobalan Palanivelu.

We have found this article which has done the trick for ourselves:

 

Removing the Facebook, WhatsApp, or Telegram Message Buttons from the Actions Dashboard in Creatio

https://customerfx.com/article/removing-the-facebook-whatsapp-or-telegram-message-buttons-from-the-actions-dashboard-in-creatio/

 

The remaining buttons can be removed by using the browser inspector to identify the buttons and then enter a remove similarly.

Hi,

you can use the Section actions dashboard manager application from the Marketplace to choose which action to show/hide: https://marketplace.creatio.com/app/section-actions-dashboard-manager-creatio

Show all comments

Hi Community,

 

In our CRM Version 7.18.2, the excel report builder (https://marketplace.creatio.com/app/excel-reports-builder-creatio) upload template is not working. I have noticed this error on web browser logs every time we are attempting to upload excel template.

 

Like 3

Like

3 comments

@Devlabs Excel Reports BuilderSame issue for my customers, seems to be no longer compatible.

Hi Community,

 

Any news about this case?

 

I have the same problem in my machine who is version is 7.18.5 and the type is Service Enterprise.

 

Do you have any idea how to solve it?

 

Hi to all!



We reviewed the add-on and tested the issue. However, we were unable to reproduce it on our end. Could you send us more details about it? Specifically, please send us your template for testing and your Excel report configuration.



Also, please check the package version and installation date.

Show all comments

Hi All,

 

Is there any performance metrics tool available to perform the load test on plugin available in Marketplace? We are looking to analyze the site performance when Change log plugin is installed and enabled. 

Change log for Creatio | Creatio Marketplace

 

I have read thru this community post submitted couple of years back but would like to know if there is any monitoring tool available post that with any recent update. 

Performance / Load testing of GUI and Web services | Community Creatio

 

Also, if any one using Change log plugin, I would request your valuable feedback about the plugin usage based on performance metrics.

 

Please Note: we have  a site expected to have 200+ concurrent users.

 

 

Thanks

Anupama K

Like 0

Like

1 comments

Hello Anupama,

 

Currently, Creatio does not have any kind of solution out of the box for this task.

You can monitor the performance of your instance in other ways by using next options:

 

If you have an on-site version of our product:

    You can use tools as Zabbix or Grafana;

    You could check the logs of your SQL server;

    You could check your IIS logs;

If you have a cloud version of our product:

     In case of any slowdowns of your instance, please contact our technical support.

 

Thank you,

Artem.

Show all comments

Dear Team,

 

We have written a process to provide the access to a lead based on the owner selected. Attached, screenshot of the process [Access Provided to the Employee.jpg].

But the manager of the employee defined in the organizational structure and the manager above the employee in the structure are also able to edit the lead whereas they need to have only read only option as defined in the process.

 

Organizational Structure via screenshot

 

 

TopMost Manager.jpg

                Manager’s Manager.jpg

                                Employee Manager.jpg

                                                Employee.jpg

 

In the process, have mentioned only read and edit option to Employee and other roles [tied hardcoding to read only] but still they are able to edit the lead.

Are there any changes to be done in object permission? 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Like 0

Like

2 comments

Adding to the above question, noticed that access assigned record level to any records is not working as expected. Even if all the users are given only read access, still the users are able to edit the record in  7.18.5.1500 version

 

Amritha Mayan Gorky,

 

Hello, 

 

In our system Managers of a group inherit all the access rights of other users in this group. It's expected oob behavior and this logic cannot be overwritten with a business process, meaning that even if you remove the access rights with a help of business process, they will be granted on a system level.

As of now, such behavior cannot be changed with a help of basic system tools and require development. 

Also, we already have a corresponding query for our R&D team to implement the described functionality in the upcoming versions.

I will assign this case to the project in order to increase its priority.

Thank you for helping us to make our application better!

Best regards, 

Anastasiia

 

Show all comments

Hi Community,

 

The latest Creatio emulator is still not compatible to latest version of google chrome. Could you please share to me any download link of GoogleChromePortable version 79. I could not find any relevant link over the web. I found one, but it is giving error during installation (The installer was unable to download Google Chrome (Stable)).

Like 0

Like

1 comments

Hi All,

 

I am facing an issue with the file system development mode. I was trying to enable file system development mode on my local setup for a package that I developed on a cloud setup. When I installed the package on my local setup and compiled, there was no error. But after enabling the "File System mode", then downloading the package to the file system, when I tried to compile I received many errors w.r.to the js files in the package. But everything is working as expected on the UI. Screenshot attached for reference.

 

Local setup Version- 7.18.4

Cloud version-7.18.3

Like 0

Like

5 comments

Hi,

 

Please provide the code inside the file that returns an error.

Hi Oscar Dylan,

 

The error is showing for all the available schemas in the package, but inside the schema there is no error. I have attached one sample schema where error is showing.

 

 

 

Sourav Kumar Samal,

 

it's strange that these errors are returned for .js files upon compilation that should affect only C# schemas. Try generating the source code for all items and then compiling once again.

Hi Oscar Dylan,

 

Yes I have tried that also but the error is still showing. The error is showing only after enabling the file system mode and downloading the package to the file system. But before that there was no error showing.

Sourav Kumar Samal,

 

Got it. Please email us at support@creatio.com, provide us with the package that was installed and with a description on how we can reproduce this issue using the clean OOB version of the app. We will try to reproduce the issue on our end.

Show all comments