to add colors to the value, if you know which div it is exactly, you can use the class or id of that div in the selector instead of ".label-wrap .t-label" as in step 1 of the example. Or you can look up the class or id by using inspector tool (Ctrl+shift+C) in the developer tools (f12) on your page and then use them in the selector.
If you require more assistance please provide screenshots of div you want to color, would provide more clarity how to change the selector accordingly.
I would recommend you to use the new FreedomUI pages on the site. You can change bg-color in the system settings on the FreedomUI page (on your screen shot I can see Classic UI). It will take 10 min maximum.
To change colors with FreedomUI :
1) Open System designer -> Advanced settings
2) Find the Custom Object CasePriority or create a replacement:
3) Add the new column -> Other -> Color:
4) Add Title to the new Color column on the same page
5) Click on the Name of this object and choose value (Title name from p.4) in Color field:
6) Publish this object
7) Open System Designer -> Lookups -> Case priorities -> View -> Select fields to display:
I'm having an issue with the partner lookup in opportunities.
When we try to select a partner against an opportunity it seems to delete the owner from the field. And when I try to re-add the owner it removes the selected partner.
The owner of the Opportunity with "Partner sale" business type and chosen partner can be:
1. the user/contact related to the account with "Our company" account type;
2. the user/contact connected to account with chosen partner company.
According to the basic logic, the "Partner" field should be available only for the "Partner sale" type. You have removed the business rule that hides the "Partner" field for other opportunity types.
Therefore, it turns out that now the "Partner" field is available for all types of opportunities, but according to the box logic, this field should be empty for other types, so it is cleared when you select the owner.
If you select the "Partner sale" opportunity type, then the "Partner" field will not be cleared when you select the "Owner" field.
I haven't tried it myself, but not sure if that button would still appear if the user doesn't have object permissions on the lookup entity being referenced by that field? May be worth a try. At least it would prevent users from actually creating the new lookup object, even if the button still remained.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to remove the button in a lookup.
As a variant, you can configure access rights and limit access to the button. However, there is no possibility to limit access to individual system lookups and such a setting will be applied to all lookups.
We have also registered a problem and forwarded it to the responsible R&D team for further review.
I would like to know if there are any issues with creating a new application from the application hub, with a new page and section in Version 8.0.4? We are still in Classic UI but from the application hub I can only create Freedom UI sections. Will I run into issues or should I continue to create new sections using the Wizard until we have upgraded to Freedom UI?
We just continue to create and modify sections in Section wizards and still are using Classic UI. And we use Application hub only for installing package
Thank you for your reply. I have read the documentation and I have created an application in the Application hub. Then I tried adding the section to a workplace but it does not get added (no error message, just never loads in the workplace). Is this what you meant by these sections are not supported in Classic UI? Could my users still access and work with this new Freedom UI section from "My Applications" workplace?
OK that is good news. So just to confirm, this new section that I create in the Application hub will be Freedom UI. My Creatio instance is ALL classic UI but this one new section will be available in that workplace and when the user selects that section, it will open as Freedom UI. Correct?
Would that new section be fully functional in my system and live with the other classic UI sections?
We just continue to create and modify sections in Section wizards and still are using Classic UI. And we use Application hub only for installing package
Does anyone know how to remove a Business Process Notification. I have one where the process log has been cancelled and one where the process log does not even exist, but the notifications are still showing as needing to be actioned. Assuming some kind of DB update but not sure the correct table etc. Thanks
In this case, you can delete values from the "SysProcessElementToDo" table using the lookup functionality. As an example, set up columns to view "Title" and "Created On" to compare the record.
I would like to warn you not to delete system values that may be needed for the system to work. Delete only the values you mentioned.
Is there any general customisability around the notifications system? Specifically for Freedom UI, but in general would be useful to know too - with alerts just showing a red dot on Freedom UI if there's even a single notification, having a few Business Process Tasks outstanding (as we expect in our business case) for a user prevents them seeing that any "Reminder" notifications have come in since they last looked at the panel. This could lead to them missing important notifications.
We have an object that we no longer need and would like to essentially retire it by hiding it from view of the users across the system, including from object lists they see while creating dashboards. I tried checking off the "Show in advanced mode only" checkbox at the object level thinking this would achieve the desired effect but the change would not take after publishing the object and the checkbox shows as unchecked again.
I have a few questions:
-Is the "Show advanced mode only" checkbox the appropriate and best solution for essentially retiring an object and hiding it from view of users?
-Are there alternative options that would achieve the same effect? I would think changing the object permissions to remove view access from everyone would work.
-Any ideas why the "Show advanced mode only" change wouldn't be taking?
For background, we are on Creatio 8.0.6 with an on-prem instance.
We recommend using the "Show advanced mode only" option for essentially retiring an object.
Unfortunately, there are currently no other alternatives to this functionality.
Regarding your issue with the checkbox not being ticked:
We have tested this logic and unfortunately could not reproduce it on the version in question. As this is a point case, we need to analyse the issue in more detail to provide a solution. To do this, we ask you to contact our technical support team at support@creatio.com.
On normal fields, it's easy to deactivate the ability to create new records for a specific field on a page. But when adding a list pointing to another object, I have not seen the ability to do so .
Am I missing a parameter option or it is not yet possible ?
Unfortunately, as of now, there is no such possibility.
Thank you so much for your idea. We've registered it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in future application releases. Thank you for helping us to improve our product.
Do you have any guide in the academy to fix this in coding in the meantime ? Because it is an issue that was not existent in Classic UI Details and is quite an issue reported by all our clients....
Seems like you might want a grid container (Area from the Layout Elements section of the page designer) within that flex container? These would keep the relative sizes of the 2 fields proportionally the same through resizing. For example, below I added a grid container with 6 columns to the flex container, and set the width of the first field to 4 columns (by clicking & dragging the resizer on it) and the width of the second to 2 columns. Number of columns can be adjusted to allow you to get the ratio you want:
Seems like you might want a grid container (Area from the Layout Elements section of the page designer) within that flex container? These would keep the relative sizes of the 2 fields proportionally the same through resizing. For example, below I added a grid container with 6 columns to the flex container, and set the width of the first field to 4 columns (by clicking & dragging the resizer on it) and the width of the second to 2 columns. Number of columns can be adjusted to allow you to get the ratio you want:
I'm getting below error while installing "SMPageRefresh",
The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FKYru8eiQRBeFoEfawvRwKSlCy2o". The conflict occurred in database "SaEENU_5379138_0529", table "dbo.SysCulture", column 'Id'.
