Hello,

You should use construction like dateTimeTest.Year.ToString() to get the year from your date\time (if we are discussing server-side logic). Something like (in Visual Studio):

DateTime dateTimeTest = DateTime.Now;
string yearPart = dateTimeTest.Year.ToString();
Console.WriteLine(yearPart);
Console.ReadKey();

The output is:

In business process (script-task or process methods) the approach is the same, but you need to put the "yearPart" string into some text parameter of the process to use it further.

If we are interested in the client-side logic then you need to use the getFullYear method (described here https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_getfullyear.asp).

Hello, 

The field ProcessElementId refers to a record in the SysProcessElementData table. This table contains information about all the running elements in business processes. The value ProcessElementId represents the ID of the element that created this specific activity.

It tags the records. Each record imported has a tag added of the date time of the import. When you click that link from the notification it opens the section and sets a filter for that specific tag.

Ryan

Ryan Farley,

 

Thank you Ryan.

I wanted to send a notification when data is imported in a particular object. As you stated above "when we click on notification it opens the section", how can I get that section details or which table in database is the section id stored for that particular import?



Thanks in advance 

Goparna Nasina

Goparna Nasina,

The information is stored in the ObjectNameInTag table.

For example in AccontInTagTable.

Bogdan,

 

Thanks Bogdan

Hello,

The issue is that the 'Databowl Lookup' object did not have the 'Databowl ID' field, unlike the 'DB Campaign ID' and 'Databowl' objects. In the 'Equals to page column' field, you can select columns that exist in both the detail object and the object where this detail is placed.

For user convenience, when creating a detail, this field is automatically filled as 'ID.'

Additionally, you can read about creating and configuring details in the academy.

Sergii Zhmurko,

Thanks for your reply, however both objects do have that column. They are identical in name and also the lookup that they point too. Unless I have misunderstood your reply I am not sure that is the issue

Hi, If the issue continues to occur in this case, please contact Creatio support (support@creatio.com) for a more detailed analysis. Also, to proceed with the analysis, we will need access to the website.

Hello Singla,

You can add  "showValueAsLink": true  in diff. More information you can find here:

https://community.creatio.com/articles/how-can-we-store-url-and-make-field-clckable-form?_gl=1*17twi4f*_gcl_au*MTYxNTAzNjkzMi4xNjkyOTU4NzI3 

Best regards, Anhelina!

Hello,

The component behavior is pre-configured and non-editable.

However, we registered the idea it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in future application releases.

Thank you for helping us to improve our product. 

Hi David

We've worked around this by creating buttons that trigger processes.

Inside the process the checks are run, and then the state is changed.

Rgds,

Luis

Hello,

Could you please describe your business task in more detail so we could better understand how exactly you need the system to work?

To accomplish this we store the stage in an attribute and then can revert back if needed. I have an example of this here https://customerfx.com/article/how-to-prevent-users-from-moving-a-case-…

Ryan

Luis Tinoco Azevedo,

Hi Luis,

I have thought about this.

However, how to implement this concept if the DCM has many stages?

Do we need to create a button for every stage?

David

Ryan Farley,

Hi Ryan,

Thank you for the article.

The approach in the article is very neat. It might be the suitable solution to my problem.

I love the articles from customerfx.com.

Thanks again.

David.

Mira Dmitruk,

Hi Mira,

Assume the screen below, on a certain condition the "Sales order service" should not be empty before entering the "In progress" status. However, I couldn't set the "required" attribute on the field from the business rule, because the condition is a bit complex.

In this case I need a validator before the status changes to "In progress".

David

Hello Andriana,

In order to use the static “Math” class in C# code you should add the “System” namespace to the file:

using System;

If the issue still exists, please provide us with a source code of the module and the error message. It will help us to analyze the issue in more details.

Additionally, please find more information about the “Math” class in the article by the link below:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.math?view=net-7.0 

Best regards, Anhelina!

Hello,

Please feel free to use the resolution from this article:  https://community.creatio.com/articles/setting-filter-mobile-application

Also, in case you want the assignee to be "current user" you may be interested in this answer: https://community.creatio.com/questions/get-current-user-contact-mobile

Thanks Bogdan,

If I log in to an instance as a regular user and not as a supervisor in web isntancce, by default, it lists all the records in a section for which the user has access, irrespective of whether they are the owner or assignee. This happens because the user has access, and the user's name is not available in any of the fields in the record, such as the owner field or assignee field. The record is shown because the user has access to it.

The same functionality needs to be achieved in the mobile app. However, here, we need to add a filter condition. For the scenario described above, we need to specify a reference field. If we set the owner field to the current user, it will list only the records where the user's name is linked to the owner field. But what about the records that the user has access to but does not own? How do we achieve this in the mobile application?

Thanks Bogdan, but can you help for the below scenario:

If I log in to an instance as a regular user and not as a supervisor, by default, it lists all the records in a section for which the user has access, irrespective of whether they are the owner or assignee. This happens because the user has access, and the user's name is not available in any of the fields in the record, such as the owner field or assignee field. The record is shown because the user has access to it.

The same functionality needs to be achieved in the mobile app. However, here, we need to add a filter condition. For the scenario described above, we need to specify a reference field. If we set the owner field to the current user, it will list only the records where the user's name is linked to the owner field. But what about the records that the user has access to but does not own? How do we achieve this in the mobile application?

Regards,

Mayan

Hello Mayan,

You can use this method to display all data:

Enter link [NameOfYourWebSite] .creatio.com/0/Features, search for UseMobileSearchOnlyInSections on this page. Uncheck all the boxes as you see in the image:

At this stage you can see all records in the mobile app.

Next you can use an article from Bogdan’s link to add filters if needed. Also I can recommend you one No-code way of filtering:

1. System designer -> Mobile application wizard -> Needed workplace
2. 
3. Find needed page (for example Order) and set the default filter. It will be impossible to get data in a mobile app which does not match the criteria of this filter

Best regards, Anhelina!

Hello Abhishek,

If you want to generate a report for selected records only, you should use multi select option:

Hello Bogdan,

We have added a  detail named "Display Images," as shown in the attached image. We tried to use the multi-select option, but it is still generating for all records instead of only the selected record.

Abhishek,

Unfortunately, there is no such possibility for now.

Please note that our R&D team is aware of this expected Printables behavior and the Idea from our customers that the Printables should Print not only Sections but Details as well.

 

Bogdan,

Is there any update on this issue , we also wanted to print selected record from detail into a single printable report