Could you please specify from where exactly would you like to call this function and the purpose of it? Is it from a different application by calling a specific URL/endpoint?
In the word report that I have created I want to use the characters « someWords here... ». By default creatio uses these characters to indicate a field name but in my case I have to use these characters on my document as normal characters.
I am using a formula in MS word that makes a sentence appear in my word report only if a specific field is not equal to 0.
Here is the place I have written the formula that contains special characters (which are not indicating any field name)
The formula I used:
Contract Clauses No[#AddTextIfNotEqual|0;words... « someWords here between these chars... » words again... :#]
The result I get when report is printed:
words… \« someWords here between the special chars \» words again
As you can see Creatio reads these chars (« ») as special chars and adds slashes (\) before them. All I want to do is make these chars appear without the slashes before them.
As for now, unfortunately, there is no possibility to use word formulas in compose with printables and our R&D team has a problem regarding this functionality and we hope that it will be updated in one of future versions of the application.
This happens in the Application Section. When i fill in the product terms and try to save the Application this pop up is shown. Meanwhile the object SysFinApplicationSpecRight doesnt exist at all in the database. How can I fix this problem ?
I have discussed your case with the responsible R&D team. Unfortunately, as of now, there is no possibility to implement your business task and we do have the correspondent problem registered on our side. The R&D team is currently working on implementing this new functionality in one of the future releases of the application.
Thank you for helping us to make our application better.
I have developed a service in Creatio that will be called from third parties. The service is called successfully in postman but programmatically it doesn't work. The authentication works fine and returns status code 200 and the BPMCSRF cookie. When the third party tries to call the service it gives the following message "401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials." How can we investigate this issue? Does Creatio offer a logging option so we can investigate the request and response or is there something else that we have forgotten during the implementation of this service?
For a specific page schema, the metadata of the page differs from Dev and Test env. The nr of rows is the same , but the content isnt. Is this supposed to be correct ?
Please be informed that the sole fact of the schemas being a bit different is not a problem, the question is does it cause any actual issues to the performance of the site? Also, please specify if the Test env is a full copy of Dev and if so, was that schema present on the Test env before copying? Also, did you make any changes to the schemas yourself?
Full generation is needed to build links between
configuration items. Items can be objects and schemas or
links between packages and their dependencies.
Full generation links them.
Compilation, in addition to its main purpose also generates
source files along the /src path which are necessary when
working with no-code elements and allow you to create an
instance between an object and a table in the DB.
Full generation is needed to build links between
configuration items. Items can be objects and schemas or
links between packages and their dependencies.
Full generation links them.
Compilation, in addition to its main purpose also generates
source files along the /src path which are necessary when
working with no-code elements and allow you to create an
instance between an object and a table in the DB.
Parameter IsLocked mainly affects if you can edit the schema or the package. Only the author of the lock can edit these elements. In the database, this author isn't mentioned and you can see only IsLocked.
The system will check the author on the other level.
I'm using isDetailEnabled method in client side to remove add button in detail based on specific conditions. For users in "System Administrator" role I want to allow the add button for every detail.
JSCODE:
isDetailEnabled: function(detailName){
var esq = Ext.create("Terrasoft.EntitySchemaQuery", {
rootSchemaName:"SysUserInRole"});
esq.addColumn("SysRole");// add filter for current user
esq.filters.add("UserFilter", Terrasoft.createColumnFilterWithParameter(
Terrasoft.ComparisonType.EQUAL, "SysUser", Terrasoft.SysValue.CURRENT_USER.value));// add filter for role name, joining to SysRole (which is where the name is stored)
esq.filters.add("RoleFilter", Terrasoft.createColumnFilterWithParameter(
Terrasoft.ComparisonType.EQUAL, "SysRole.Id", "83a43ebc-f36b-1410-298d-001e8c82bcad"));
esq.getEntityCollection(function(result){if(result.success&& result.collection.getItems().length>0){returntrue;}returnfalse;});returnthis.callParent(arguments);}
Since EntitySchemaQuery is asynchronous, it doesn't wait for the results to return before the isDetailEnabled function returns. You'll need to pre-fetch if the user is in the role (maybe in the init, or elsewhere) and save that result in an attribute or something, then just check the attribute from the isDetailEnabled function. Does that make sense?