+1 for this

Hello Stefano,

If user self-registration is not required, you can remove the “Register” button from the portal login page:



change the ShowPortalSelfRegistrationLink parameter in the Web.config file to:

 

<add key="UseStaticFileContent" value="false" />



Best regards,

Bogdan

Bogdan,

thank you bogdan

So, if my instance is on  cloud I have to open a case for the support 

Hello,

Please check the object permission for the Contact and Account for "All portal users" in the “Object permissions” section?

alonadolya,

Hi

For Contact and Account, the permission is set for "All portal users". Images attached for reference.

Nisarg Soni,

Hi!

The problem is that the record permissions are turned on and portal users don't have any permissions there. Therefore portal users don't get access to any records. 

Please add permissions of kind (All employees -> All portal users), clear the cache, re-login under a portal user and you should see the records in the list!

Best regards,

Max.

Max,

Hi

Thanks for the solution. It works!

Dear Stefano,

Sometimes you can catch a bug when trying to save a new version of the process with script-task to assembly package.

This bug is actual for 7.18.5 and lower versions, for example. But in 8.0+ versions it's already fixed.

As a workaround, I can suggest you use a simple package, not an assembly one. 

Of course, the best way to fix it is to update your application to 8.0+.

Best regards, Alex.

Aleksei Efimenko,

Thank you Aleksei

Hi Fulgen,

Please refer to the following article:

https://academy.creatio.com/docs/developer/back_end_development/objects…

There you can find the description of the Terrasoft.Core.Entities.Events.BaseEntityEventListener class that provides the handler methods of various entity events.

To find some examples, you can run the following script in the database:

SELECT * FROM "SysSchemaSource" WHERE "Source" LIKE '%OnDeleting%'

It will show you schemas that use the OnDeleting handler method.

Best regards,

Max.

Max,

Any example in mobile client side? The same manner as how these two works in mobile business rule:

"Terrasoft.BusinessRuleEvents.ValueChanged" and "Terrasoft.BusinessRuleEvents.Save"

Hello Petrika,

 

In order to achieve this you can go to the Advanced settings and find the page that you would like to transfer, the data type will be "Client module". Then you can copy all the content that is inside of the "Diff" array of objects and paste it into the page that you have in the portal. If there are any business rules or other differences you should copy them as well. In the portal page you should leave as it is the entitySchemaName and the details of the page, the rest should look as it looks in the page that you are transfering.

Best regards,

Dariy

Dariy Pavlyk,

Thanks for the response Dariy. I made something like this. Base Section was the parent page by default for the Application Form Portal Page.

I changed the Parent object 

In this way i inheriteted everuthing from the Application Form Edit Page . Will this bring me any kind for Problems ?

Hello Petrika,



That shouldn't cause any problems as the Application Form Edit Page that you are setting as the parent inherits it's properties from the base section page.



Best regards,

Dariy

Hi Sourav,

Please be informed that the [WAIT FOR TIMER] element will not work correctly with such a big value, it will definitely drift off the needed amount of time at some point. Could you please elaborate on what business logic you're trying to implement, so we could try to find a possible alternative for you?

Kind regards,

Mira

Hi Mira,

We have a similar case although not so much time, "just" 5 days.

Will the wait timer element not work for a period like this?

Also the expectation is to have several hundred cases that will be simultaneously be in this "wait" mode.

Thanks,

Luis

Luis Tinoco Azevedo,

I'm sorry for the confusion, we have double-checked this functionality with our R&D team and they confirmed, that Wait Timer will work correctly even with such a big value specified. Please feel free to try it out and in case you do face any issues, make sure to register a case for our support team.

Kind regards,

Mira

Hello!

Ensure that you add the /ssp prefix to the route when making a request as a portal user.

A feature called "EnableCustomPrefixRouteApi" enables web services custom routing and restricts SSP user access services without the /ssp prefix.

In order to enable it you need to run the following script in the database:

INSERT INTO AdminUnitFeatureState (SysAdminUnitId,FeatureState,FeatureId)

VALUES ('720B771C-E7A7-4F31-9CFB-52CD21C3739F',1,'17ED5BE9-CA87-42A4-A761-3466DBABF925')

Another feature called "UsePortalDataService" divides services into the portal and non-portal ones. To enable it run the following script:

INSERT INTO AdminUnitFeatureState (id, SysAdminUnitId, FeatureState, FeatureId)

VALUES (newid(), '720B771C-E7A7-4F31-9CFB-52CD21C3739F', 1, '45D7102E-42D5-4E61-ADF8-77F00CD2F3E8')

So make sure you are using the /ssp prefix and both features are active in the system.

Best regards,

Max.

We also suggest replacing 

[DefaultServiceRoute]
[SspServiceRoute]

with

[DefaultServiceRoute, SspServiceRoute]

Best regards,

Max.

Hello Massimiliano,

Ability to add mailboxes to the system can be limited through the "System Designer" -> "Object permissions" -> "Mailbox synchronization settings".

This way you can temporarily or permanently limit the ability to add mailboxes to the system for a specific user or role. 



Also, if you are using one of the latest versions of a system you can do the following:

1) Add all the mailboxes under one system user, for example under Supervisor.

2) Supervisor user can perform all the needed settings for the mailboxes, for example from which folder exactly emails should be synchronized.  

3) After that Supervisor user will set up the access rights for the mailbox ("Allow Shared access" setting in the mailboxes settings). 

This way user will be able to work with emails, but will not be able to apply changes to it's settings themselves.

Best regards,

Anastasiia

Anastasiia Zhuravel,

I tried giving object permissions only to system administrators but my test user is still able to add a mailbox: the UI reports a javascript error and the mailbox creation doesn't complete (see image below), but it's not what I expected.

Is there something I'm missing or that object permission doesn't work as expected?

Thanks

Hello Massimiliano,

This is the correct behaviour. There will be no notification about missing access rights, only the loading screen, but the user will not be able to add the mailbox. There is already a request created for our R&D team to add a meaningful notification for users, it will be implemented in future releases. I have assigned your request to the project in order to increase its priority. As for now, the solution described by Anastasiia is the only option.

Best regards,

Anastasiia

Hi Stefano,

You can create a data binding for the SysLocalizableValue object and add all the records regarding the image to this data and it will be transferred when the package is moved between the environments.

Best regards,

Oscar

Oscar Dylan,

thank you Oscar

a data binding for the SysLocalizableValue object require the databinding for a lot of object:

- SysSchema

- SysPackage

- SysWorklplace

I choose to create an update script for the SysLocalizableValue.ImageData column

Hello Petrika,

Unfortunately, It is not possible to change the text in the error message. The problem here is that the schema that defines it is very hardcoded in the application core. It is not possible to replace and modify it. 

Best regards,

Bogdan

Thank you Bogdan ! Best regards

Petrika,

Assuming the field is a text field, you can try the following custom approach in client page schema.

1. Make the field not required in the section wizard.

2. In the client page schema, add the following code in the methods:

methods: {
	// Redefining the base method initiating custom validators.
	setValidationConfig: function() {
		this.callParent(arguments);
		this.addColumnValidator("UsrProductTerms", this.ProductTermsValidator);
	},
	ProductTermsValidator: function(){
		var invalidMessage ="";
		var ProductTerms = this.get("UsrProductTerms");
		if(ProductTerms.length != 0){
			invalidMessage ="";
		}else{
			invalidMessage = "Product Term is required in order to proceed"; //Put your custom message
		}
		return {
			invalidMessage : invalidMessage
		};
	},
},

Now you can see your custom validation message. Similar approach can also be used for fields of type Lookup, Date, Integer etc.

Regards,

Sourav Kumar Samal