Hello Amritha,

I've discussed your question with our R&D team.

 

Unfortunately, there are no basic tools to configure alignment in the pivot table for now.

 

I've registered the idea for our R&D team to implement this functionality in further releases.

Thank you for helping us to improve our product. 

Hell Alex,



RABBITMQ does not require load balancers for its work.

If the question is how to set up deployment with high availability, RabbitMQ cluster mode is used for this.

Several nodes are configured as a cluster and data are replicated between them automatically. More information can be found in the article Clustering Guide - RabbitMQ.

As for the Docker/Kubernates is, we can recommend images from the bitnami company - containers/README.md at main · bitnami/containers · GitHub, clustering is already configured there and there is also good documentation.

Creatio uses Quorum Queues — RabbitMQ, so you don't need to configure anything besides connecting to the cluster. But this applies specifically to the work of creatio with RMQ. If the question is about the mail microservice, this paragraph is not relevant.

 

I've found that if:



1. Set Access rights by Operations

2. Give Access rights for Portal users

3. Recompile everything



Then object records are visible on Portal. 

Is it correct, that Access rights by Operations are mandatory to display object on Portal?

Hello,

Access rights in Creatio are distributed according to the “least access” principle. This means that portal users are prohibited from everything that is not given direct permission.

After adding an object to the "List of objects available to the portal user" lookup, you need to check the rights to create/modify/delete operations and the rights to the columns for the added objects.

You can find more details on managing access rights on the portal in the article on the Academy: https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8-0/user/more_apps/portal/manage_porta…

Hello!

Please delete the "Remove" blocks from the replacing ActivityPageV2 schema in the Custom package:

    {

                "operation": "remove",

                "name": "ConnectionWithProjectControlGroup"

            },

            {

                "operation": "remove",

                "name": "FullProjectName"

            },

Alona Dolya,

Thanks!

Hello Artem,

If the contact was fully deleted from the system, it cannot be restored, sorry.

WHat if that contact was merged, instead of deleting of it? can we see merged record's information in somewhere? 

Ismet Sinan Ekici,

There is no such possibility in our system.

Hello Anastasiia,

We recommend you creating a case directly for our support team at support@creatio.com providing all the details regarding this question, so we could properly check the issue.

Mira Dmitruk,

Thank you

Anastasiia Savchuk,

It would be nice to describe the solution here as well, cause we also have similar issues with Kanban

Hello Vladimir Sokolov,

Please note that to keep this Marketplace app free of charge support is provided via issues on GitHub.

Mira Dmitruk,

Unfortunately we haven't received answer on GitHub

Would also like to have solution described in community, rather than having to go back and forth between 3 platforms (partner portal, github, community).



Or maybe, having an FAQ for common marketplace place app issues directly in marketplace apps as a new tab to find the answers directly with the right app ?

Hello,

Please note that unfortunately in such system with joined access there is no way to implement this logic. If a record is available to more than 1 user, they will all be able to access it at the same time and make changes to it at the same time. They can save the record one by one, all the changes will be applied, but the changes made by the last user to save the record will stay.

Hi Mira,



If  user1 is editing a record, and user2 should not be able to edit the same record, and system should show error message saying "user1 is editing this record" and prevent user2 from editing the record. How to implement this functionality? 

Nishit Singla,

As ws mentioned above, this kind of logic cannot be implemented even through means of development due to specifics of the system. While a user is making changes to the fields, before this user saves the record, no actual changes are being made. All the changes are only displayed on their side of UI, but before the actual "Save" these changes aren't "registered" in the system in any way, they don;t actually takeplace, therefore this logic cannot be implemented.

If there's any chance for this to be implemented in the future, it would be most welcome :)

Hello,

I've run into a small test by displaying the configuration items detail on the contact page and by applying fields locking on the configuration item page. When opening the configuration item from the detail located on the contact page the fields are locked. So the issue is that the conditions that you use to lock the page are not working as they should.

Oleg Drobina,

We use no condition for the test on ContractPageV2:

 

        attributes: {

             "IsModelItemsEnabled": {

                 "dataValueType": Terrasoft.DataValueType.BOOLEAN,

                 "value": false

             },

    diff: /**SCHEMA_DIFF*/[

             {

                 "operation": "merge",

                "name": "CardContentWrapper",

                 "values": {

                     "generator": "DisableControlsGenerator.generatePartial"

                 }

             },

I've tested on demo environment with 3 sections: Contract, Document and custom Test section. The same result for all of them

Try below code and let me know if it works. 

attributes: {

            "IsModelItemsEnabled": {

                "dataValueType": Terrasoft.DataValueType.BOOLEAN,

                "value": true

            },



onEntityInitialized: function() {

this.callParent(arguments);

                this.set("IsModelItemsEnabled", false);

            },

diff: /**SCHEMA_DIFF*/[

             {

                 "operation": "merge",

                "name": "CardContentWrapper",

                 "values": {

                     "generator": "DisableControlsGenerator.generatePartial"

                 }

             },

Vladimir Sokolov,

I was also able to reproduce it for Contracts, will contact our R&D department for clarifications and return to you once I receive any feedback from them.

Nishit Singla,

Thank you! This works

Oleg Drobina,

Besides, I've found, that this doesn't lock 'Connected to' fields in Document:

Hello,

The logic of this list creation is located in the "SupplyPaymentDetailV2" module in the "initItemTemplates" method that is triggered by the "init" method in the same "SupplyPaymentDetailV2" module. This formed list of templates is than connected to the "AddTypedRecordButton" button in the "controlConfig" property:

{
						"operation": "merge",
						"name": "AddTypedRecordButton",
						"values": {
							"caption": "",
							"click": {"bindTo": "onAddButtonClick"},
							"controlConfig": {"menu": {"items": {"bindTo": "ItemTemplates"}}}
						}
					},

So the logic of populating the list of templates is located in the "initItemTemplates" method that should be debugged further.