Hello,

The possible reasons, why user can't open the page:
1. User does not have permissions to page data source. 
2. The list page is not added to any workplace, available for user. 
3. Another page is configured for the current user (or his role) in the object related pages.

Solution:
1. Set up correct permissions, workplaces (check 1-3 points above). 
2. Add page to the Whitelist of pages to bypass page opening restrictions lookup, if customer want to allow any user can open via direct URL regardless of configured permissions. 
3. Add user (or role) to CanBypassPageOpeningRestrictions system operation to bypass all restrictions. We strongly recommend to use correct configuration (not just bypass permissions) to provide the best level of security. 

Mira Dmitruk,

This worked for me, 
 

Add page to the Whitelist of pages to bypass page opening restrictions lookup, if customer want to allow any user can open via direct URL regardless of configured permissions.

Thank you!
Solem A.

I create such pages in the business process - predefined page

Hello,

Not sure about removing buttons (but theoretically it's possible using the "Visible" property), but as for the "Enabled" property, it's possible to control the state of the button. This can be achieved using sandbox messages exchange mechanisms like (control the copy button "Enabled" property in the detail on the case page based on the case category selected):

CasePage schema

messages: {
			"UpdateActionsStatuses": {
				mode: Terrasoft.MessageMode.PTP,
				direction: Terrasoft.MessageDirectionType.PUBLISH
			}
		},
		...
onCategoryChanged: function() {
				this.callParent(arguments);
				this.sandbox.publish("UpdateActionsStatuses", this.get("Category"), ["ForActionsStatusUpdate"]);
			}

Detail schema

messages: {
			"UpdateActionsStatuses": {
				mode: Terrasoft.MessageMode.PTP,
				direction: Terrasoft.MessageDirectionType.SUBSCRIBE
			}
		},
....
CopyRecordMenuItemEnabled: {
                    dataValueType: this.Terrasoft.DataValueType.BOOLEAN,
                    value: false
			},
....
getCopyRecordMenuItem: function() {
				return this.getButtonMenuItem({
					Caption: {"bindTo": "Resources.Strings.CopyMenuCaption"},
					Click: {"bindTo": "copyRecord"},
					Enabled: {bindTo: "CopyRecordMenuItemEnabled"},
					Visible: {bindTo: "IsEnabled"}
				});
			},
....
subscribeSandboxEvents: function() {
				this.callParent(arguments);
				this.sandbox.subscribe("UpdateActionsStatuses", this.updateActionsStatus, this,
						["ForActionsStatusUpdate"]);
			},
 
			updateActionsStatus: function(result) {
				var parentCaseCategory = result.displayValue;
				var isCategoryCorrect = parentCaseCategory == "PPE Case (Sales Contract)";
				this.updateCopyRecordMenuItem(isCategoryCorrect);
			},
 
			updateCopyRecordMenuItem: function(isCategoryCorrect) {
				var parentCopyRecordEnabled = this.getCopyRecordMenuEnabled();
				var isEnableCopyRecordMenuItem = isCategoryCorrect && parentCopyRecordEnabled;
				this.set("CopyRecordMenuItemEnabled", isEnableCopyRecordMenuItem);
			}

As a result the copy button will be enabled in the detail only if any record is selected in the detail and also if the case category (case page is where the detail is added) is "PPE Case (Sales Contract)".

Yes, it worked. Thank you

Anybody have any experience of working with such a setup?

It would be great to have the view be able to inherit permissions from some object that the view has as a lookup column. However, I don't believe that is possible. What I typically do is this:

1. Create a view and include as a column some other object that has permissions (for example, if the view includes an Opportunity lookup column and the account has permissions)
2. Anywhere the view is used, include a filter condition that some column on that related object is not null (that would never be null). Plus it cannot be the Id or the column used as the display value. Example, if my view has a lookup for Opportunity, I could use Opportunity.Stage is filled in.
3. Using this approach, the user will only see the rows corresponding to the related record that they have access to, since if they cannot view the related opp the Stage will return a null value. 

It's not ideal and definitely not secure, but it does limit the view rows to what the user can see on the related object.

Ryan

Yeah that's a clever workaround, many thanks Ryan! Agreed about the security aspect, but for the the cases where it's just about having those record permissions used to define non-security visibility as I currently have for the base entity it will work for now.

It would definitely be good for the view entities to be able to inherit permissions from lookup columns though, and feels like it would be a relatively quick win for Creatio to add, as most of the functionality around that would already exist. It could even be done in a no-code way by enabling the creation of these view-based entities directly in the config, effectively adding a logical layer to the platform which would be great for filtered views into the data and adding virtual calculated fields. So much utility to be had with such a logical layer.

I forgot to add that I use version 8.0.10.4735

It's not yet available in Freedom UI --> Creatio Roadmap indicates for Q4 2023 https://academy.creatio.com/docs/release/creatio-roadmap?check_logged_i…

Damien Collot,

Thanks Damien, at least I know that I did overlook something.

Hi Damien,

I do not have access to the link to the roadmap.

I get this message:

"

Access denied

You are not authorized to access this page.

"

Is it restricted?

It is very interesting information.

Thanks,

Luis

Hello,

It's possible. Default values can be set via configuration for all replaced objects. For example, if I want to set the default Account for Orders I create replaced object for Order and specify it in the default value field. It can be selected from existing values, system settings, or variables.



Please note that if the selected default value is removed or the type of system variable and lookup is different it can lead to different issues so do not select values that can or will be deleted. 

Hi Bogdan,

Thank you for the explantion but my question was a little bit different.

The question is how/where to configure a new System Variable beside the existing ones:

New ID

New Sequential Id

Current User

Current User Contact

Thank you,

Sasori

Hello Sasori,

These values are hardcoded and you can't change them.

This is the area I mentioned on another computer, could it be related to the installation files?

Burak Toprak,

What is the product version you are using?

Sourav Kumar Samal,

8.0.6 

Hi!

If you are trying to create an object that should inherit properties from other packages, and nothing is being inherited, make sure you have added dependencies to those packages.

To do this, you can open the "Dependencies" section on the package creation page and add dependencies to the packages from which you want to inherit properties. If the package has dependencies, the installation of these dependencies is checked during package installation, so make sure you have added all the necessary dependencies for inheriting properties.

If the problem still persists, make sure you have added the proper object settings according to your requirements. If necessary, refer to the Creatio documentation https://academy.creatio.com/docs/7-17/developer/development_tools/packa….

To add to what Alla said, whatever object it is that you want to select as your parent, find what package that object is in and then add that package as a dependency to your package. If you're wanting to select BaseEntity, I believe that package is Base.

Ryan

hi LÉZORAY Nicolas,



The Error: Multiple replacements of the same schema in a single package are not allowed refers that the object schema is already available in the current package. 



Could you confirm the current package doesn't have this Object?

Also do you have any custom created package and where this replacement is tried?



Below is the successful replacement of object in custom development package.





 

BR,

Bhoobalan Palanivelu.

Hi Bhoobalan Palanivelu !

I don't see how you managed to create the replacement object without error.

In the custom package i have no activityparticipant object:

If i go into Allpackage i have the same files as you (without the DEVLocal one):

Here's how i proceeded:

In the next screen, in the inheritance field, i entered "activityparticipant" 

And then i got the error message:

Can you please let me know how you managed to create your custom item ?

Thank you for your help !!!

Have a nice day,

Nicolas

LÉZORAY Nicolas,

By chance could you please try it in another custom-created package (Custom_Transfer) rather than OOTB Custom?

Bhoobalan Palanivelu,

It works in the another custom package.

I have never used this one.

Thank you !

Hello,

As we mentioned in the submitted case to support, we do not recommend you manually check those boxes, to properly add them please follow the steps below:

1. In the object, permissions section add your restrictions
2. The system will create a "copy" of the object you are working on in the current package as a reference to the original object
3. In that copy, you will see the checkboxes checked for the chosen options from object permissions.

Please make sure to set the "Current Package" system setting to the one you are developing in.

For further questions please refer to your support case.

Thank you.

Hello,

 

You can create a business process in which you will fill in the required fields received from the web service.

 

Details on the academy website:

https://academy.creatio.com/docs/user/bpm_tools/process_elements_refere…