Dear Sayed!

We can see that you have already submitted a case for our support team and this case is currently in progress. We will update you in that request. 

Have a great day!

Any ideas on how this might be possible?

You can avoid needing the prefix by clearing the prefix system setting. Then no prefix will be needed.

However, I'm not sure creating the object would be a good idea, perhaps? Seems risky. What I would do is create a database view wrapping the data and then expose that as an object instead. That seems like the best route to me.

Ryan

Thanks Ryan, sounds like a great idea - then the view over the top of the change log table can have its columns renamed where the prefix isn't present to start with the prefix, which will avoid the need to turn prefix off and on when adding new columns to the change log view entity.

Harvey,

Can I ask, what tables the change log is saved to if you know?  Or if there is a view to read the change log?  There is an API I note but I have a scenario where a SQL query is the better option.

Hi Gareth, the name of the tables created for the change log is Sys[object name]Log, so for example for the Account entity, it would be SysAccountLog. Hope this helps!

Hello Harvey,

You can use out-of-the-box examples of bulk deletion logic. For example we can take the BulkEmailTargetArchiver class and the DeleteArchiveLevel method in it:

private void DeleteArchiveLevel(string sourceSchemaName, string targetSchemaName) {
			int processedRecords;
			do {
				var deleteQuery = new Delete(_userConnection).From(sourceSchemaName)
					.Where("Id").In(new Select(_userConnection)
						.Top(_batchSize)
						.Column("s", "Id")
						.From(sourceSchemaName).As("s")
						.Where().Exists(new Select(_userConnection)
							.Column(Column.Parameter(1))
							.From(targetSchemaName)
							.Where(targetSchemaName, "Id")
							.IsEqual("s", "Id")));
				processedRecords = deleteQuery.Execute(_dbExecutor);
			} while (processedRecords != 0);
		}

This is just one example of the logic. You can use:

select * from SysSchemaSource

where Source like '%DeleteQuery%'

 

to get other schemas in the application configuration with delete queries examples and build your own one using all examples you may find in the system.

Hi Oleg,

using these Delete classes bypasses Creatio’s internal logic though, right? So change logs will be inaccurate and any BPs that should be triggered on delete would not be triggered etc. This seems risky to me as important processes could hang off this, and I don’t know what other internal aspects of Creatio might be relying on logic that Creatio manages at an application level.

Is there any way to bulk delete while respecting that?

Hello,

Bulk/trigger emails are not supposed to have files attached to them since the email provider can reject sending this email. The only way to have a file (for example pdf file) being attached to an email if it is a trigger/bulk email - is to put this file as a link to the body of an email. Your file should be stored in some public storage that can be accessed by anyone and the link to it will be like this https://test_storage_system/$File/TestSheet.pdf.

But if you put this link to the body of an email - recipients will get an error when opening it. So you need to use the OpenElement parameter at the end and make the link look like this

https://test_storage_system/$File/TestSheet.pdf?OpenElement. As a result, users will see opened pdf documents (which they can download after that) that can be accessed from your bulk/trigger email.

Bogdan,

Hello thank you for your reply. I'll find a way to generate a link of my file and use it within a bulk email

Hello Harvey,

It is possible, and you do it in the right way as I can see from the description. To prevent saving you have to declare this handler in the scheme and simply do not call next?.handle(request). 

Hello,

If I'm not mistaken, you can use simple OOTB validation that is described here https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8.x/dev/development-on-creatio-platfor…

Hi Dmytro,

This doesn't give us a way to trigger the validation manually though unfortunately. What we were trying to achieve was to show the validation message to users without saving/trying to save the record at that point in time. We ended up making our own very basic error message that shows the results returned by

request.$context.validate()

if there are any and stops the user progressing in our custom path, but it would be good to be able to tap into the OOTB error toast message so it's a little more detailed and polished.

Harvey Adcock,

Hello! 

Unfortunately, so far, we don't have the functionality to trigger the OOTB validation snackbar-message without saving /trying to save the record. 

We have registered your suggestion, and our R&D team will consider implementing it in future releases.

Thank you for making our product better!

Best regards, 

Natalia

Harvey Adcock,

Dear Harvey,

See this community article, I think it could help you to answer your question https://community.creatio.com/questions/dynamic-parameter-validator-freedom-ui

Regards,

Julio

Hello,

Our R&D team has a task to implement a multicurrency field in Freedom UI in the 8.2 application version.

Unfortunately, there are no examples in the documentation or application of implementing it in the current application versions. So please wait until 8.2 when this column will be available out-of-the-box and could be used on the pages.

Thanks for your answer.

Hello, ElSayed!

Such problem can appear when you've opened the app in a few tabs and logged out+ loged in on one of the tabs. For example: the tab with the configuration page is open and you're writing code there. Then you press the save button, click on the nearest tab to check the result, and relogging to the second tab. After this, your changes in the first settings tab will not be saved. Or it can happen if you have two settings tabs for one object.

I would recommend you to close all tabs and try to add the CSS again, save it and check the result by reloading the page button.