Hello Justin,

string myString="myfielddata-data";

int indexRetrieved=myString.LastIndexOf("-");

string result= myString.SubString(indexRetrieved);

other way:

string myString="myfielddata-data";

string arMyString[] = myString.Split("-");

string result = arMyString[1];

Creatio does not like it when the UsrName is changed. You will need to change it back. You can change the title, but you cannot change the Name. You can, however, not use it. If you create a new String, you can change the Displayed Value in the Advanced Settings for the object to the new String you made. This changes the blue links to the new string instead of the UsrName.

Reid Burger,

Thanks for clarification.

I also would like to know if I can change the Required - At application level to No for UsrName.

RAMNATH SHARMA,

It is fine to change properties like required at application level to no. If the field is being used as the display value (like the name field) then having it blank would mean nothing would show in a lookup (if its used as a lookup somewhere). 

BTW it's usually a good idea to not rename column or object names and only change the titles once they're created. 

Ryan

Ryan Farley,

I changed back the names to UsrName using section wizard (which I later realized shouldn't have changed them back). Then I compiled the current workspace from Advanced settings to see if still any error occurs. 

Here are some screenshots

Now The errors are because I changed back the name to UsrName, it says that the old Name - UsrClaimant don't exist.

I also opened the source code where these errors were pointing to - 

But I can not edit the source code in Cloud demo instance.

Is there any way to change the source code or any process to correct these source codes?

Ramnath

Hi Ramnath,



As Reid mentioned, we do not recommend to change the name after the section being created.



If such an issue appears you can simply generate source code for all objects that are mentioned in compilation errors and compile modified items. If all necessary items were not removed this should fix the issue



Thank you.

Bohdan Zdor,

Thanks. I will definitely try this out.

Mitch, 

You will have to read the lookup within the PCR Data, in your example not only do you have to "Read PCR Data" but you should also read the "PCR Change Type" lookup (in another element) which is in the object you are already reading.



The filtration will be something like 'ID = Read PCR Data.PCR Change Type'.



Extra** The reason you got your result (and why it is still technically true) is because you are only reading the UID value of the lookup and not the Name value - there is some magic that happens to connect the UID.Name in the view. So what your code is doing is casting the UID 'type' to string 'type'.



Hope this helps!

Philip Wierciszewski,

Perfect! thanks so much!

Dear Yuriy, 

We haven't performed such precised tests, however, the size of the string field is approximately 2 bytes per character. You can perform tests yourself populating columns in sql and evaluating the difference in size of the table. However, the value of the field itself doesn't affects the performance of the system. The amount of columns may affect the performance of the system depending on how often and in which volume you get the data (how many records and how many columns) as it loads an sql to the certain extent. However, 20 text fields shouldn't cause much trouble. There are some ways of optimizing this based on what's said above, e.g. when you use Read Data element in the Business process we recommend to read only columns that are further used in the system. 

Dear Janine,

To do that you need to specify "String.Empty" value for this string as a formula in "Modify data" element (like on the screenshot http://prntscr.com/nfh32l).

Best regards,

Oscar

I did that and it ignored it, like "".

The only thing that I've found that works is creating a dummy String Parameter that has nothing in it, i.e., Blank Text, then setting the Modify data field that I want to be empty to the dummy parameter.

Janine White,

I personaly tested "String.Empty" formula value and it removed the value of the string field to an empty value and it should work on your side either.

As for paramter set for the string field as an empty text parameter - it also works and you can also use this parameter if needed.

Best regards,

Oscar 

Oscar Dylan,

When I put String.Empty, not in quotes, in the formula, it displayed "String.Empty", not an empty string, for the field.

Janine White,

Please email us to support@bpmonline.com and provide us with the link to the application and with the name of the section where you try to implement this logic and we will take a look closer. We can't reproduce this behavior on our side so we need to see the field you are trying to change and the process that was created on your side that should change this field.

Best regards,

Oscar

It will be hard to catch the [tab] click event. The problem is that the [tab] key is reserved for changing an active element in a browser.

The [Enter] key will be easy to catch. I would do the following:

define("ContactPageV2", [], function() {
	return {
		entitySchemaName: "Contact",
		attributes: {},
		modules: /**SCHEMA_MODULES*/{}/**SCHEMA_MODULES*/,
		details: /**SCHEMA_DETAILS*/{}/**SCHEMA_DETAILS*/,
		businessRules: /**SCHEMA_BUSINESS_RULES*/{}/**SCHEMA_BUSINESS_RULES*/,
		methods: {
			onEntityInitialized: function() {
				this.callParent(arguments);
			},
			onPhoneClick: function(e) {
				if (e && e.keyCode === 13) {
					console.log("show popup");
				}
			}
		},
		dataModels: /**SCHEMA_DATA_MODELS*/{}/**SCHEMA_DATA_MODELS*/,
		diff: /**SCHEMA_DIFF*/[
			{
				"operation": "merge",
				"name": "AccountPhone",
				"values": {
					"layout": {
						"colSpan": 24,
						"rowSpan": 1,
						"column": 0,
						"row": 4
					},
					"keyup": {
						"bindTo": "onPhoneClick"
					}
				}
			}
		]/**SCHEMA_DIFF*/
	};
});