Hello,

Unfortunately, this logic is hardcoded and cannot be changed at the moment. We have raised an improvement for the development team to make it possible to configure the default Category for this element in future releases.

Thank you for reaching out!

Thanks Pavlo, so no properties in the JSON can be set for this currently at all then? And no overriding of any of the schema handlers would enable setting them either? We currently have a fair amount of handler code, so wouldn't be too worried about adding some more in for now until this is possible in no code.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to change this logic for this scheme at the moment, even using such handlers.

Hello,

 

The user's timezone is stored in the SysAdminUnit table, in the TimeZoneId column. However, please note that values in this column are stored not as references to time zones from the directory, but as Time Zone Codes.

You can verify the code in the "Time zones" lookup.

So, you can change this value for any user without logging in with a script in the database:

update "SysAdminUnit" set "TimeZoneId" = 'GMT Standard Time' where "Id" = '***User's Id***'

Thank you for reaching out.

Thanks Pavlo, in the end we added the Timezone field to the System user page (UserPageV2) so that we can change the timezone of users without executing SQL. For others wanting to do the same, we used the following code for the user page replacing schema:

define("UserPageV2", ["UserPageV2Resources"],
	function() {
		return {
			entitySchemaName: "VwSysAdminUnit",
			diff: /**SCHEMA_DIFF*/[
				{
					"operation": "insert",
					"name": "TimeZone",
					"parentName": "Header",
					"propertyName": "items",
					"values": {
						"dataValueType": Terrasoft.DataValueType.ENUM,
						"value": {"bindTo": "TimeZone"},
						"layout": {"column": 13, "row": 2, "colSpan": 8}
					}
				}
			]/**SCHEMA_DIFF*/,
			attributes: {
				/**
				 * Time zone.
				 */
				"TimeZone": {
					dataValueType: Terrasoft.DataValueType.LOOKUP
				}
			}
		};
	}
);

Hi Harvey, we have similar needs, but no result, unfortunately. 

So, we log all parameters manualy before calling web service :(

Hello Harvey,



If you want to see the body of the request generated by the web service and the response that comes from the server - You can try to use Telerik Fiddler tool to capture requests that are being sent from the Creatio instance

 

But this advice is relevant only for local environments.

If the environment is on a local machine, you can connect Fiddler and test it.

 

In general, if you do not want to use data tracing for a process, we believe that this goal can be achieved through development. For example, a web service call will be made using a script task, in which you will process various responses from the server and write the information you need into a table using C# code.



Thank you.

Hi Mariana, this seems very strange. Are you sue you don't have any contacts that are called "Hardware / ...." which may have been created by mistake through another process. 

No, I don't. These are the names of all my opportunities and my contacts 

Hello,

 

The "To" field in this item receives entries from the VwRecepientEmail view, which is generated by a script up to version 8.1.2. This view, in turn, gathers email information from the "ContactCommunication" and "AccountCommunication" tables.

 

The behavior you described is not expected and is not reproducible on the standard Creatio builds.



Please ensure that you do not have custom logic responsible for forming the VwRecepientEmail table or the Contact/Account Communication, which could affect this behavior.

 

If you are unable to resolve the issue, please contact our support team for analysis at support@creatio.com.

 

Thank you!

Hello Justin,

string myString="myfielddata-data";

int indexRetrieved=myString.LastIndexOf("-");

string result= myString.SubString(indexRetrieved);

other way:

string myString="myfielddata-data";

string arMyString[] = myString.Split("-");

string result = arMyString[1];

Hello!

This means that there can be logic at the event layer level that changes the value of this field when saving a record. It can be on action: OnUpdating, OnSaving. Details here:

https://academy.creatio.com/docs/8.x/dev/development-on-creatio-platfor…

Or changing a given field leads to another action that changes its value again.

To track exactly where this field changes, you can write additional logging when the record is saving, in various methods, such as OnUpdating and OnSaving, on the EntityEventListener. This logging will help you find exactly where the field value changes.

Hello Harvey,

It's not possible for now, but we've registered it in our R&D team backlog for consideration and implementation in future application releases.

Thank you for helping us to improve our product. 

Hello,

The problem is not in the container, when you open a page from a section, the system still thinks that you see a section page. Therefore, the condition for your button isn't applied.

In order to fix it, you need to create your button in a combined mode, for example.

Take a look at the button and its condition is defined in a SectionV2 page as well as PageV2.

Hello,

Currently there is no basic functionality to setup access rights for users dynamically within the import process itself. However, you can use the following alternatives to achieve your business task:

Set up record permissions for the needed object based on the record author and then import the records under different users in separate batches based on the role.

For example, import a batch of records that only the role A should get access rights for under user1. Setup the record permissions this way:

If record author is user1, then give access rights to role A.

Then import the next batch of records under user2 and setup the record permissions as:

If record author is user2, then give access rights to role B.

Another option is to create a business process that would read data (read a collection of records) and then transfer the data from the records to a subprocess. The subprocesses will then process each record separately (1 subprocess will run for 1 record) and change the access rights (with the help of Access rights element) for these records. However, in such case you need to have a field in this object that would signify what role should get the access rights for which record, based on which the process will determine what rights to give to which record.

I assume you're using a Freedom UI section/page? It doesn't work with classic. Also, make sure the feature "LiveEditingForCurrentUser" is on as well.

Ryan

Ryan,

Thank you for the reply.

The page is Contacts in freedom UI.

From the Business Process I am trying to update the lookup that is responsible for the stages ( Progress Bar). The progress Bar is only updated after I click the Refresh button. 

Should I do some other modifications as well ?

Sasor

We also have this issue, but then tested in 8.1.2 and not found that



Vladimir

You should check with the support. This feature is causing performance issue in 8.1.1.

I recently had an issue after I imported more than 20k cases in a site and the support deactivated the live update for a little while until I creaed a new case on this subject.