Все прекрасно, при запуске перехожу в мейл бокс, все ок.
2. Пытаюсь добавить раздел мейл бокс в рабочее место (какое именно значения не имеет, везде одинаковая ситуация). Выбираю его, но по факту раздел не добавляется, хотя на 1 сек происходит как-бы обновление страницы и добавление.
В итоге попасть в раздел можно только по ссылке, что весьма неудобно.
Вчера я протестила этот вариант - добавить любой базовый и оказалось, что это тоже не работает. Поэтому написала напрямую в ТП, т.к. это подтверждает проблему не на стороне mail box, а на стороне creatio. Также написала о предложении Владимира очистить Redis. Когда ситуация разрешится, я отпишусь тут.
We have a creatio instance with around 100 users, who in order to authenticate use the Creatio authentication. This users are set in specific organizational and functional roles, with access rights applied to them.
We will do a sync with Active Directory through LDAP for the same 100 users, so that the users use LDAP authentication to log in to Creatio and not Creatio authentication?
1-Will these cause any duplicates with the existing Contacts ?
2- Should we deactivate the licenses of the existing users before doing the sync with AD ?
During synchronization with LDAP is checked table SysAdminUnit (table section Users), so when you synchronize the new user will be created.
You can re-bind the contact with an SQL query and then delete the new contact.
The connection to the table of contacts in SysAdminUnit is made by the ContactId column.
Also, by checking the SysAdminUnit table, if the system already has a user bound to a contact, we cannot create another user bound to an occupied contact.
If users were previously synchronized over LDAP and they have an LDAP element, the system should not generate new contacts/users.
I can change access rights to object in process. But before providing access rights to Document I would like to check whether desired group already has access to record. Is it possible to do it by process?
I created an attribute to be able to disable it when there is an unsaved field, the problem is that I can't change it, and the page in the two images above are the same page, it is a detail page.
Could you please share with us more details on the page/detail where you are using this, and the current code implementation that you have for your button?
Is there a way to freeze a record - lock all fields and connected details - based on a condition? For example, if an Order status is set to Completed, all the fields and details connected to order record should be locked. In order to make any change to the record, the status has to be changed from Completed to In Progress and then the record is unlocked.
If you wish to change access rights on a particular stage of the Order, you can simply add a "Change access rights" to its stage:
With it, you can state which roles/users should have their rights set to "read-only".
Alternatively, you could create a trigger process that is triggered once the stage of your Order section is changed and then do the same rights delegation as mentioned above with the "Change access rights" element in your business process (I created an example that is based on the stages of the leads section):
However, the most reliable way to do this is to use a process and change the access rights of the record(s) - otherwise, they could still be changed in other places, such as the mobile client.
There are webservices that are called from client side when some fields are changed. Even with the permission restriction, these change events will still be triggered when the value is changed although it can not be saved by clicking the save button.
Looks like Ryan's solution is more compatible with the customizations we have in place now. That would help us lock the field giving no provision for the user to change the field value.
I have an editable list, and I want that one of its columns "Product" be displayed as a link. So that when its clicked it redirects automatically to the Product section.
How can this functionality be achieved ?
Does this involve overriding the addColumnLink: function ?