Hello,

I'm trying to add an auto-numbering field in the Leads section following the instructions here: https://academy.creatio.com/documents/technic-sdk/7-13/how-add-auto-numbering-edit-page-field

I've made the 2 new system settings required:

I've also made a replacing Lead object in the package I'm working on and added a new event trigger before the record is added:

The process triggered by this signal on the object is set up with the expected elements:

With conditional logic:

One thing I think is missing is how to tie the new system settings into this process.  Is there a schema or input I need to update for this?
 

Also, do the process element parameters need to be populated on the user task?

Thank you for your help finding what needs to be fixed to get this working!

Hello. Is there a way to fill the field values ​​from the master window in which you opened the lookup (lookup field) and clicked the "New" button? Something similar to how adding a record in a datagrid detail works. When you click add a record, a window with fields opens and these fields can automatically pull values ​​from the master page.

Hello, I'm wondering if there is a way to import sharepoint comments directly into the feed in creatio? I could not find any articles or other questions on this. We'd like to move data from sharepoint over to creatio and to have users use the feed similar to how they used sharepoint comments. It's important that we can move over this data.

Thank you,

Eric

Hi Team,

I'm trying to set up a report for Order section using FastReport. The intent is for users to apply the required date filter on the Order section and generate the report for that period. For eg, order report for month of April, May etc.

The problem I'm facing is that I'm unable to show the selected date period on the report heading (eg. Order Report 04/01/2024 - 04/30/2024). All the rest of the data populates fine. Not sure if there is a way to pass them as parameters to the report template.

Can anyone suggest a way to achieve this?

Hi, adding Edit access to a specific column for All Employees role is not saving.
Use Case:  for the Invoice object, All Employees have Read access only (Operation Permission).  For one field ("Field X"), wish to give Edit access to All Employees.  In attempting to set the Column Permission using "Permit reading and editing" for Field X, the permission can be added and applied, but on save and returning to the Invoice security settings, this column permission no longer appears.
Say there are 50 fields on Invoice, the edit access is specific to one field (the rest are all read only).  We want to add this edit access as an exception (1 column setting)..rather than individually set column access for all 50 fields.
It seems the Operation Permission for the role is overriding any further column permission to add additional access rights for that Role for the specific field.
Any suggestions or insights welcome...thanks.

Hello,

How can i fix this issue. it shows up each time i drill into a posted lead.

I tried to create module Config with below Code. Also added the same in MobileApplicationManifestMETCHLExecutiveMetLifeChile . but it is not working. Please help.

Hello Guys,

I need to filter by Tag the account list page in Freedom UI.

I already tested what reported in this article: https://community.creatio.com/questions/using-tag-freedom-ui?check_logged_in=1#comment-89348

but it only works for "new sections".

The new Creatio structure uses the "Tag" section to store tags for all objects but Accounts, Contacts, etc (old existing sections) use a specific table to store their tag (that is AccountTag, ContactTag, etc.).

The quickfilter component set to filter by tag refers to the generic "Tag" entity then it doesn't show the tags of the Account (stored in AccountTag entity): it doesn't work.

Can anybody help me and tell me how to filter accounts, contacts, etc by tags in Freedom UI list pages?

Thanks

Regards

Hello, 

any support with runtime error? Can you share your experience?

Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

Hi,

Our team is working on a project for Creatio 8.1.2 (for Linux and PostgreSQL). We collaborate using filesystem mode and save our changes in a Git repository. When uploading changes to the instance, we first perform the "Update packages from filesystem" operation, followed by "Compile." Our project currently consists of slightly over 30 packages. We have encountered several issues when transferring changes to other instances.

At a certain point, we started experiencing problems with uploading changes to the instances. This is particularly noticeable when creating new instances. After connecting the repository and performing "Update packages from filesystem" for the first time, numerous errors can be observed (by going to the /dev view, then selecting all packages and sorting by status in descending order). These errors include information about a broken constraint, a non-existent column in the database, etc. Following this lead, I hypothesized that during the "Update packages from filesystem" operation, many database connections are opened, exceeding the limit defined in the PostgreSQL configuration. I verified it, and the default max_connections option was set to 100. When I increased it to 300, the problem stopped occurring on newly created instances. However, it seems to me that it should not consume such a large number of connections, and I don't think continuously increasing this number is a good solution as our project grows. Is there any option in Creatio to fix it?

Some changes do not work immediately after being uploaded to a new instance. You need to go into the configuration of the specific element and perform the PUBLISH operation on the target instance. Sometimes (although rarely), the system informs us that a given business process requires re-publishing. More often, however, something doesn't work, and it's hard to know this normally. For example, a query to a web service returns 404, even though it was uploaded to the target instance, and the compilation was performed immediately after the upload. Performing a complete compilation does not solve this problem. I have to go into the class with the given web service and re-publish it. The problem is that whether something works after uploading the changes seems completely random. Sometimes restarting a container with creatio, redis and postgres help, but it's not a rule. We test the changes thoroughly on our own instances, but after uploading the changes to the client's production instance, they may not work. We would really have to perform full regression tests to detect all the problems, and this is cumbersome.

Do any of you have similar problems and know how to deal with them? Thanks in advance for your responses!