The approach is the same as in the community thread Bogdan shared, but in your case you need to first add you button and then call parent method logic.
The approach is the same as in the community thread Bogdan shared, but in your case you need to first add you button and then call parent method logic.
We have deactivated the "Handoff to sales 7.8.0", and we have implemented our custom process for it. But the OOTB BP gets triggered from its parent BP "Lead management 7.8.0".
Also updated the system setting value of "LeadmanagementProcess" to the newer BP name. But when we try to run the flow the BP is not triggered and there is no error in the console when tried to debug, it's getting the right process from the value from SysSetting, but for no reason, the process is not been triggered and no logs found.
Approach 2:
I have overridden the process "Handoff to sales 7.8.0", in such a way when the process gets triggered it will terminate by not performing any logic.
Ref Image,
But when we run the flow it throws the below error.
Kindly, help us in identifying best way not to trigger "Handoff to sales 7.8.0" process ?
Please note that Lead management process 7.8.0 is a complex process that consists of sub-processes that are triggered by the lead status change.
You can open it from the Process library to analyze its logic and understand how it works. If you want to customize it, you need to copy this process or create a new one, then disable the standard process and enable your own.
I just wanted to deactivate the BP - "Handoff to sales 7.8.0". Even though I deactivated it manually it tries to run from the parent process called from the "LeadmanagementProcess". I made an exact copy of the "LeadmanagementProcess" removed the subprocess calling HandOff to Sales and changed the system setting value. But there is no error and the process is unable to trigger (Approach-1, mentioned above).
What is the best and easiest way to deactivate "HandOff to sales 7.8.0" BP without disturbing mostly on other items?
The first thing that comes to mind is to call a sandbox message in your detail save. In the main object schema, you need to subscribe to this message and call the save and close button methods.
For example, if we have 100 employees and 30 of them are white-collar and the other 70 are blue-collar, how many named users and/or concurrent users might we need for Creatio Workflow?
Workers who work physically in an enterprise are called blue-collar, while those who work in the office and work in management are called white-collar.
My main question is: What does the user license described in Creatio mean? What rights do they have. Does every person working in the company need to have a user license? For example, is it possible to send an e-mail to a person who works in a company but does not have a user license? Or can someone without a user license interfere with a process?
I've got a frustrating one I am hoping someone will be able to help with! :)
On version 8.0.4 I had made the attachment component of the freedom UI editable through adding the same code that is used on other list components. However, with 8.0.5 that no longer works! - Anyone have any idea how to do that?
By design, the Attachment component in Freedom UI doesn't allow you to edit columns, or have the ability like other lists to turn on the "Editable" toggle.
This means that you are unable to update other columns, such as document type in the example below.
On previous versions I got around this by adding "IsEditable" attribute to "true". However, it looks like on the latest version the code has changed, which when applied to an attachment component it does not work.
The below code is what is used to define if a list should be editable on a standard grid. Is there any other way to do this on the attachment?
Thank you. Unfortunately, the line of code to get localizable string :
var bodyTemplate = UserConnection.GetLocalizableString(ClassName, "BodyTemplate");
gives the following error in Visual Studio
'UserConnection' does not contain a definition for 'GetLocalizableString'
I had referred this link earlier, and since the definition was absent, I was wondering if I am missing something or there is any other way to get the localizable string in Source Code Schema