When I reply to an email I expect that the new email will carry forward ALL of the connections of the original email. Instead, at least one connection, Activity, is left blank.
Can this functionality be added?
We are using rev. 8.0.1.1990 cloud based Sales module.
Thank you for confirming. This is the basic logic of the application. The thing is if you forward a letter - there is no business value in connecting the very same email to the same activity. We have registered a task for our R&D team to review this logic. I will assign your case to the project in order to raise its priority.
On the contrary, there is every business reason to maintain all of the connections on an email when replying to that email. In essence, all of the connected objects make up continuous threads of activity on those connected objects. It's the same logic behind maintaining the Account link, or the Opportunity link, etc.
I believe my expectation of the behavior (copying/maintaining all of the connections) is what any user would expect.
ActionsDashboardMessagePublished - is the base message present in the BaseMessagePublisherPage module, hideTabs is the base method that hides tabs (located in the BaseActionsDashboard) and openTask is the method from the BaseActionsDashboard that opens the activity page.
In case you need to replace it everywhere in the system you need to place this code in the replaced BaseActionsDashboard module.
ActionsDashboardMessagePublished - is the base message present in the BaseMessagePublisherPage module, hideTabs is the base method that hides tabs (located in the BaseActionsDashboard) and openTask is the method from the BaseActionsDashboard that opens the activity page.
In case you need to replace it everywhere in the system you need to place this code in the replaced BaseActionsDashboard module.
As i have not done a lot of creatio customization I struggle a bit where to place your piece of code. My LeadSectionsActionDashboard module looks like this.
We investigated this behaviour and currently, the system behaves correctly since you can add a macro in the signature so it could fit the template or depend on some value.
We have already registered the idea for our R&D team to implement this functionality in further releases. I will assign your case to this project in order to increase its priority.
I have modified the Activity object in order to display a custom Object (Order) and added an Activity column too.
Now, when clicking on the RightSideMenu I have the same object (Activity = Attività, and Ordini = Orders) repeated twice. Does anybody know which module is in charge of displaying the options within this menu? Or do you have any idea of what the "cleanest" solution might be?
Basically, there is a table in the database called EntityConnection. You can delete all the records from this table that refer to the objects which you do not need (for example, contact, requests etc).
You can do the following:
delete from EntityConnection where SysEntitySchemaUid in (select Uid from SysSchema where Name = '')
where '' is the name of the object, for example, Contact.
But the thing is if you delete the records from the EntityConnection table - the next fields on the activity page will be deleted automatically as well:
Basically, there is a table in the database called EntityConnection. You can delete all the records from this table that refer to the objects which you do not need (for example, contact, requests etc).
You can do the following:
delete from EntityConnection where SysEntitySchemaUid in (select Uid from SysSchema where Name = '')
where '' is the name of the object, for example, Contact.
But the thing is if you delete the records from the EntityConnection table - the next fields on the activity page will be deleted automatically as well:
in the newer versions of a system (starting 7.17.1) where Exchange Listener is turned on, the synchronization runs in real-time (may take about 60 seconds to find a new mail).
Unfortunately, there is no option to change this setting in the current configuration.
In order to delete the object from this list, there is a need to delete corresponding records from the EntityConnection system table.
You can delete all the records from this table that refer to the objects which you do not need (for example, contact, requests etc).
You can do the following:
delete from EntityConnection where SysEntitySchemaUid in (select Uid from SysSchema where Name = ''),
where '' is the name of the object, for example, Contact.
But let me mention, that if you delete the records from the EntityConnection table - the corresponding fields will be deleted not only from this list but also from the "Connected to" detail of the email activity page:
Do you have any idea why mailbox synchronization from my customer is not working well? They told us that they always have the problem that mails from this folder are not synchronized. When they synchronized it manually it works.
One example: On April 26, the synchronization worked. Not again on April 27, and a day later on April 28 all emails from April 27 appeared in the CRM.
I checked the system settings regarding mailbox synchronization interval and all looks good:
Can you please help me out with this issue? What do you think it could be a problem?
I have a question regarding linking email to Activity. Is there any difference with using this way to link email :
or this way using "+" button:
In documentation there are no words that these two ways are different but I am asking this because my client is having problem with this. Precisely In first way of linking email one Activity is missing, but when they are using "+" button it's there.
Can you please help me out with is problem, what do you think could be an issue?
There is no difference in these two variants on how to bind the email to the needed object.
But on the email preview, there are only two options to bind the email.
But you can click the "+" button in the top right corner of the email message and select the [ Add new ] command and there will be available more objects to bind the email.
We confirmed this information with a responsible R&D team and indeed as of now there is no option to rename these sections or columns, they were designed with "service" titles (section 1,2,3 etc) and renaming option was not implemented for them.
I have registered a corresponding query for our R&D team to consider implementing this functionality in the upcoming versions of the main application.
Thank you for the idea and helping us to make our Application better!